Estimating and Testing for Differential Treatment Effects on Outcomes When the Outcome Variances Differ

被引:9
作者
Bodner, Todd E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
construct validity; treatment effects; multivariate analysis; data standardization; statistical inference; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; EFFECT SIZES; EQUIVALENCE; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1037/met0000158
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Researchers working in the context of randomized trials routinely estimate and test for treatment effects on the study outcomes. This article discusses the merits of assessing differential treatment effects across outcomes and proposes a multivariate approach using standardized outcomes for this purpose. This multivariate approach extends prior approaches to an arbitrary number of treatment groups and outcomes and does not require that the within-group covariance matrix have particular properties (e.g., sphericity). Theoretical analyses articulate the inferential basis for earlier recommendations for data standardization prior to analysis and demonstrate that inferential procedures (e.g., null hypothesis significance tests and confidence intervals) can exhibit poor operating characteristics when unstandardized outcome data are used for analysis and differential standardized treatment effects are the conceptual, intended target of inference. This article explores these and other issues (e.g., statistical power to detect and confidence intervals for differential standardized treatment effects) and demonstrates the proposed approach using data from a published experiment. The theoretical utility of differential treatment-effect evidence is considered from a construct validity perspective for randomized trials. The proposed approach provides inferential procedures to evaluate theoretically motivated predictions for differential treatment effects on the outcomes; failure to support such predictions either calls the construct validity of the randomized trial into question or the underlying theory. The proposed approach also enables the detection of differences in treatment effects on the outcomes that are not theoretically expected; such results, especially if replicated, would motivate the need for theoretical refinements.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 137
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses [J].
Abelson, RP ;
Prentice, DA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 2 (04) :315-328
[2]   Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? [J].
Baguley, Thom .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 100 :603-617
[3]   SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDURES AND THE CHOICE OF A TEST STATISTIC IN MANOVA [J].
BIRD, KD ;
HADZIPAVLOVIC, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1983, 93 (01) :167-178
[4]   Confidence intervals for effect sizes in analysis of variance [J].
Bird, KD .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 62 (02) :197-226
[5]   Designs, participants, and measurement methods in psychological research [J].
Bodner, Todd E. .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2006, 47 (04) :263-272
[6]  
Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119558378
[7]   ROBUSTNESS [J].
BRADLEY, JV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 31 (NOV) :144-152
[8]  
Brewer MB, 2000, Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, P3, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996481.005
[9]  
Chambless D.L., 2012, APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, P529, DOI DOI 10.1037/13620-028
[10]   THE EARTH IS ROUND (P-LESS-THAN.05) [J].
COHEN, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (12) :997-1003