Interactions of News Frames and Incivility in the Political Blogosphere: Examining Perceptual Outcomes

被引:62
作者
Borah, Porismita [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Edward R Murrow Coll Commun, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
incivility; political blogs; news frames; news credibility; political trust; efficacy; CREDIBILITY; ONLINE; ISSUES; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; AGGRESSION; CONFIDENCE; GOVERNMENT; NEWSPAPERS; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2012.737426
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The anonymity and flexibility of the online world allows the free expression of views. This same anonymity and unconstrained expression can initiate uncivil debate. The political blogosphere is thus replete with uncivil discussions and becomes an apt context to examine the influence of incivility on news frames. Moreover, although there is an increasingly growing literature on framing, few have examined framing effects in the contemporary media landscape. Thus, the present study brings in literature from incivility and framing effects to examine the influence of incivility on news frames for perceptual outcomes. The study uses an experiment embedded in a Web survey. Findings show that incivility increases the credibility of a news article while decreasing political trust and political efficacy. Further, results demonstrate the interactions of incivility and news frames. For instance, news credibility is increased only in the value framed condition. And a combination of strategic frames and incivility results in the least political trust and external efficacy. Implications are discussed. [Supplementary material is available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Political Communication for the following free supplemental resource(s): stimulus material for the experiment.]
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 473
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Agenda setting and the "new" news - Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times [J].
Althaus, SL ;
Tewksbury, D .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (02) :180-207
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATI IN PRESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PROGR COMMUNICATION, DOI DOI 10.1177/107769900808500308
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV346PX8.9
[5]  
[Anonymous], AM J POLITICAL SCI
[6]  
[Anonymous], J COMPUTER MEDIATED
[7]  
[Anonymous], J COMPUTER MEDIATED
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ANN CONV INT COMM AS
[9]  
Ansolabehere S., 1995, Going negative: How political advertising shrinks and polarizes the electorate
[10]  
Ball-Rokeach S.J., 1990, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, V2, P249, DOI DOI 10.1093/IJPOR/2.3.249