Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: Evaluation by meta-analysis

被引:38
作者
Yu, SH
Kim, CB
Park, JW
Kim, MS
Radosevich, DM
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Inst Hlth Serv Res, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Clin Outcomes Res Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Transplant Informat Serv, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
abdomen; US; appendicitis; ultrasound (US); meta-analysis;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2005.6.4.267
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: We wanted to review the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) for the diagnosis of appendicitis and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of US according to patients and researchers characteristics. Materials and Methods: The relevant Korean articles published between 1985 and 2003 were included in this study if the patients had clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis. The histopathologic findings were the reference standard and the data were presented for 2 x 2 tables. Articles were excluded if patients had no sonographic signs of appendicitis according to graded-compression US. Two reviewers independently extracted the data on study characteristics. The Hasselblad method was used to obtain the combined estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the performance of US. Results: Twenty-two articles (2,643 patients) fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The estimate of e calculated by combining the sensitivity and specificity was 2.0054 (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.8553, 2.1554) by a random effects model. The overall sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were 86.7% (85.4 to 88.0), and 90.0% (88.9 to 91.2), respectively. According to the subgroup meta-analysis by patients' characteristics, the d, estimate (95% Cl) of dominantly younger age, male, and highly clinical suggestive group for US was 2.2388 (1.8758 to 2.6019), 2.7131 (2.2493 to 3.1770), and 2.4582 (1.7387 to 3.1777), respectively. Also, according to subgroup meta-analysis by researchers' characteristics, the d value (95% Cl) for US done by diagnostic radiologists and gray-scale was 2.0195 (1.7942 to 2.2447) and 2.2630 (1.8444 to 2.6815). Conclusion: This evidence suggests that US may be useful for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, especially when patients are younger age, male, and highly clinical suggestive.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 277
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Allemann F, 1999, EUR J SURG, V165, P966
[2]  
AN JH, 1996, J KOREAN SOC MED ULT, V15, P209
[3]   Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis [J].
Andersson, REB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (01) :28-37
[4]  
[Anonymous], REV EV SYST ID REV S
[5]   Systematic quantitative overviews of the literature to determine the value of diagnostic tests for predicting acute appendicitis: Study protocol [J].
Bachmann L.M. ;
Bischof D.B. ;
Bischofberger S.A. ;
Bonani M.G. ;
Osann F.M. ;
Steurer J. .
BMC Surgery, 2 (1) :1-5
[6]  
BAE JG, 1996, J KOREAN RADIOL SOC, V34, P671
[7]  
BAE KH, 1997, J KOREAN SURG SOC, V53, P1023
[8]   Accuracy of noncompressive sonography of children with appendicitis according to the potential positions of the appendix [J].
Baldisserotto, M ;
Marchiori, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (05) :1387-1392
[9]   ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
BIRNBAUM, BA ;
YEE, J ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
ROSHKOW, J ;
GRAY, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) :31-35
[10]   ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :207-215