Hybrid data-driven physics-based model fusion framework for tool wear prediction

被引:100
作者
Hanachi, Houman [1 ]
Yu, Wennian [2 ]
Kim, Il Yong [2 ]
Liu, Jie [3 ,4 ]
Mechefske, Chris K. [2 ]
机构
[1] LPTi, Ottawa, ON K1J 9J1, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Natl Res Base Intelligent Mfg Serv, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Tool wear; Sensor-based monitoring; Particle filter; Fusion framework; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-018-3157-5
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An integral part of modern manufacturing process management is to acquire useful information from machining processes to monitor machine and tool condition. Various models have been introduced to detect, classify, and predict tool wear, as a key parameter of the machining process. In more recent developments, sensor-based approaches have been attempted to infer the tool wear condition from real-time processing of the measurement data. Experiments show that the physics-based prediction models can include large uncertainties. Likewise, the measurement-based (or sensor-based) inference techniques are affected by sensor noise and measurement model uncertainties. To manage uncertainties and noise of both methods, a hybrid framework is proposed to fuse together the results of the prediction model and the measurement-based inference data in a stepwise manner. The fusion framework is an extension to the regularized particle filtering technique, used to facilitate updating the state prediction with a numerical inference model, when measurement models alone are not satisfactory. The results show significant improvement in tool wear state estimation, reducing the prediction errors by almost half, compared to the prediction model and sensor-based monitoring method used independently.
引用
收藏
页码:2861 / 2872
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Agogino A., 2007, Milling Data Set
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1 ACM SIGKDD WORK MA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MANUFACTURING ENG TE
[4]   3D finite element analysis of tool wear in machining [J].
Attanasio, A. ;
Ceretti, E. ;
Rizzuti, S. ;
Umbrello, D. ;
Micari, F. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 57 (01) :61-64
[5]   Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression [J].
Benkedjouh, T. ;
Medjaher, K. ;
Zerhouni, N. ;
Rechak, S. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2015, 26 (02) :213-223
[6]   ANALYSIS OF TOOL WEAR .1. THEORETICAL MODELS OF FLANK WEAR [J].
BHATTACHARYYA, A ;
HAM, I .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, 1969, 91 (03) :790-+
[7]   The concept and progress of intelligent spindles: A review [J].
Cao, Hongrui ;
Zhang, Xingwu ;
Chen, Xuefeng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2017, 112 :21-52
[8]   Development of a tool wear observer model for online tool condition monitoring and control in machining nickel-based alloys [J].
Chen, X. Q. ;
Li, H. Z. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 45 (7-8) :786-800
[9]  
COLBAUGH R, 1995, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1995 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL, P357, DOI 10.1109/ISIC.1995.525083
[10]   A DYNAMIC STATE MODEL FOR ONLINE TOOL WEAR ESTIMATION IN TURNING [J].
DANAI, K ;
ULSOY, AG .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (04) :396-399