Measurement of insulin-mediated glucose uptake: Direct comparison of the modified insulin suppression test and the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp

被引:53
作者
Knowles, Joshua W. [1 ]
Assimes, Themistocles L. [1 ]
Tsao, Philip S. [1 ]
Natali, Andrea [2 ]
Mari, Andrea [3 ]
Quertermous, Thomas [1 ]
Reaven, Gerald M. [1 ]
Abbasi, Fahim [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Cardiovasc Med, Falk CVRC, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Internal Med, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Biomed Engn, I-35127 Padua, Italy
来源
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 2013年 / 62卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Insulin resistance; Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp; Insulin suppression test; RESISTANCE; SENSITIVITY; DISPOSAL; QUANTIFICATION; OCTREOTIDE; PREDICTOR; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.metabol.2012.10.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Two direct measurements of peripheral insulin sensitivity are the M value derived from the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp (EC) and the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration derived from the insulin suppression test (IST). Prior work suggests that these measures are highly correlated, but the agreement between them is unknown. To determine the agreement between SSPG and M and to develop transformation equations to convert SSPG to M and vice versa, we directly compared these two measurements in the same individuals. Methods. A total of 15 nondiabetic subjects (9 women and 6 men) underwent both an EC and a modified version of the IST within a median interval of 5 days. We performed standard correlation metrics of the two measures and developed transformation regression equations for the two measures. Results. The mean +/- SD age of the subjects was 57 +/- 7 years and body mass index, 27.7 +/- 3.9 kg/m(2). The median (interquartile range) SSPG concentration was 6.7 (5.1, 9.8) mmol/L and M value, 49.6 (28.9, 64.2) mu mol/min/kg-LBM. There was a highly significant correlation between SSPG and M (r=-0.87, P <0.001). The relationship was best fit by regression models with exponential/logarithmic functions (R-2=0.85). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated an excellent agreement between these measures of insulin action. Conclusion. The SSPG and M are highly related measures of insulin sensitivity and the results provide the means to directly compare the two measurements. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 553
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, pS64, DOI [10.2337/dc19-S002, 10.2337/dc12-S064, 10.2337/dc23-S002, 10.2337/dc09-S062, 10.2337/dc18-S002]
[2]  
Andrews J, 1984, Horm Metab Res, V16 Suppl 1, P164
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Multiorgan Insulin Sensitivity in Lean and Obese Subjects [J].
Conte, Caterina ;
Fabbrini, Elisa ;
Kars, Marleen ;
Mittendorfer, Bettina ;
Patterson, Bruce W. ;
Klein, Samuel .
DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (06) :1316-1321
[5]  
DEFRONZO RA, 1979, AM J PHYSIOL, V237, pE214
[6]   Insulin resistance as a predictor of age-related diseases [J].
Facchini, FS ;
Hua, N ;
Abbasi, F ;
Raven, GM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (08) :3574-3578
[7]   Insulin action and non-esterified fatty acids [J].
Ferrannini, E ;
Camastra, S ;
Coppack, SW ;
Fliser, D ;
Golay, A ;
Mitrakou, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 1997, 56 (02) :753-761
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN RESISTANCE WITH THE INSULIN SUPPRESSION TEST AND THE EUGLYCEMIC CLAMP [J].
GREENFIELD, MS ;
DOBERNE, L ;
KRAEMER, F ;
TOBEY, T ;
REAVEN, G .
DIABETES, 1981, 30 (05) :387-392
[9]   The EGIR-RISC STUDY (The European group for the study of insulin resistance: relationship between insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular disease risk): I. Methodology and objectives [J].
Hills, SA ;
Balkau, B ;
Coppack, SW ;
Dekker, JM ;
Mari, A ;
Natali, A ;
Walker, M ;
Ferrannini, E .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 (03) :566-570
[10]   INSULIN SENSITIVITY TEST USING A SOMATOSTATIN ANALOG, OCTREOTIDE (SANDOSTATIN(R)) [J].
MIMURA, A ;
KAGEYAMA, S ;
MARUYAMA, M ;
IKEDA, Y ;
ISOGAI, Y .
HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 1994, 26 (04) :184-187