MERITOCRACY AND ECONOMIC INEQUALITY Perceptions, preferences and implications

被引:24
作者
Castillo, Juan C. [1 ]
Torres, Alex [2 ,3 ]
Atria, Jorge [2 ]
Maldonado, Luis [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Santiago, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Psicol Social Comunitaria, Santiago, Chile
[4] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Inst Sociol, Santiago, Chile
来源
REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGIA | 2019年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Distributive justice; Economic inequality; Inequality perception; Meritocracy; Social status; INCOME INEQUALITY; BELIEFS; EQUALITY; JUSTICE; EQUITY; MERIT;
D O I
10.3989/ris.2019.77.1.17.114
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The idea of meritocracy is related to the distribution of goods and rewards based on individual talent and effort, being a principle that legitimizes the unequal distribution of resources in modern societies. Despite the constant references to meritocracy in inequality and stratification research, there are still few conceptual and empirical attempts to understand to what extent individuals perceive and prefer meritocracy, as well as their consequences. The present research proposes a conceptual and empirical framework for studying meritocratic perceptions and preferences, which is then related with economic inequality variables. Using data from the Chilean survey "Social justice and citizenship participation" (N=1,245), the analyses suggest that meritocratic perceptions and preferences are different constructs and that those perceiving an adequate functioning of meritocracy also perceive less economic inequality.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aalberg Toril., 2003, Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinion on Income Distribution
[2]   TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY [J].
ADAMS, JS .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (05) :422-&
[3]   Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education [J].
Alon, Sigal ;
Tienda, Marta .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (04) :487-511
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GLEICHHEIT GERECHTIG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1949, THE AM SOLDIER
[6]  
Aristoteles, 1999, NICHOMAQUEAN ETHICS
[7]  
BAER DE, 1982, CAN REV SOC ANTHROP, V19, P173
[8]  
Bell D., 1977, CONTRADICCIONES CULT
[9]  
Bourdieu Pierre., 1990, Theory, Culture Society, V2nd
[10]   Class, mobility and merit - The experience of two British birth cohorts [J].
Breen, R ;
Goldthorpe, JH .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 17 (02) :81-101