Interorganizational Collaboration Networks in Economic Development Policy: An Exponential Random Graph Model Analysis

被引:87
作者
Lee, Youngmi [1 ]
Lee, In Won [2 ]
Feiock, Richard C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Cheonan, South Korea
[3] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
interorganizational collaboration; exponential random graph model; economic development policy network; COLLECTIVE ACTION; RATIONAL CHOICE; PARTNERSHIPS; COMPETITORS; COOPERATION; GOVERNANCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00464.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Regional economic development competition can be inefficient and destructive because decisions by one governmental unit can impose both externalities on its neighbors. Collaborative networks of multiple stakeholders within and across jurisdictions are an increasingly crucial component of regional economic development. In this article, we focus on the emergence of voluntary and self-organizing network relationships among local governments to address economic development concerns. The motivations and decisions of local actors play a critical role in shaping and implementing regional collaboration. On a micro level, the collaboration choices are shaped by three primary factors: the transaction costs reflected in the configuration of relationships in which an actor is embedded; the organizational similarities (homophily); and the resource dependencies that shape the local actors' preferences for forming relationships with other specific actors. We utilize an exponential random graph model (ERGM) to test hypotheses regarding the most prominent observed patterns of network relationships within and across different organizational sectors. The results demonstrate that both reciprocity and social clustering structures are preferred by both government and nongovernment organizations. These results suggest that interorganizational collaboration for economic development requires more than simple exchange relationships. Rather, network actors may be better served by participating in a densely clustered network that is capable of maintaining credible commitments to collective solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 573
页数:27
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Agranoff R., 2003, COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC
[2]  
Alter Catherine., 1993, ORG WORKING TOGETHER
[3]   Regional Integration Through Contracting Networks An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Collection Action Framework [J].
Andrew, Simon A. .
URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2009, 44 (03) :378-402
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TIME
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Social Structure
[8]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[9]   Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries [J].
Berardo, Ramiro ;
Scholz, John T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (03) :632-649
[10]   Interlocal cooperation and the distribution of federal grant awards [J].
Bickers, KN ;
Stein, RM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2004, 66 (03) :800-822