Use of PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making in Bus Fleet Maintenance Proposal of Framework

被引:2
作者
Sanches, Alexandre Milkiewicz [1 ,2 ]
Rocha Loures, Eduardo de Freitas [1 ]
de Lima, Edson Pinheiro [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pontif Catholic Univ Parana PUCPR, Ind & Syst Engn Grad Program PPGEPS, BR-80215901 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Parana IFPR, BR-82530200 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, BR-85503390 Pato Branco, Brazil
来源
25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION RESEARCH MANUFACTURING INNOVATION: CYBER PHYSICAL MANUFACTURING | 2019年 / 39卷
关键词
Maintenance; costs; decision making; multicriteria method; SERVICE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.241
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the business environment, decision making is a differential when the team responsible for it does it right. This implies some assumptions, such as knowledge of the activity, internal and external variables that impact the company's business, as well as the quality of the workforce. Thus, when the maintenance issue is addressed, be it in industrial or service companies, the expected results will be translated by the satisfaction indexes of its users. This work aims to propose a framework with the elements that lead to the proper decision making in maintenance for bus companies. For this, the multicriteria decision-making method chosen was PROMETHEE. The PROMETHEE method has the flexibility to treat data both qualitatively and quantitatively, offering different scenarios to managers on the best decision to make. It is known that companies seek to minimize their maintenance costs and maximize the quality of service provided. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1920
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT J OPERATIONS LOG
[2]   Safety Management Evaluation in Bus and Coach Companies [J].
Aparicio Izquierdo, Francisco ;
Colodron Sesemann, Yago ;
Terron Alonso, Juan Angel .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2009, 29 (06) :665-684
[3]   Assessment of innovative measures implemented in European bus systems using key performance indicators [J].
Cascajo R. ;
Monzon A. .
Public Transport, 2014, 6 (3) :257-282
[4]   A state-wise performance appraisal of the Indian roads using PROMETHEE-GIS approach [J].
Chakraborty, Shankar ;
Ranjan, Rajeev ;
Mondal, Poulomi .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (09) :3338-3356
[5]   Examining Pareto optimality in analytic hierarchy process on real Data: An application in public transport service development [J].
Duleba, Szabolcs ;
Moslem, Sarbast .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 116 :21-30
[6]  
Faghihinia E., 2012, J. Ind. Eng. Int, V8, P14, DOI [10.1186/2251-712x-8-14, DOI 10.1186/2251-712X-8-14]
[7]   Passengers' perceived service quality of city buses in Taipei: Scale development and measurement [J].
Hu, Kai-Chieh ;
Jen, William .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2006, 26 (05) :645-662
[8]   Quality of maintenance: Mirce Mechanics axiom [J].
Knezevic, Jezdimir .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2012, 18 (02) :216-+
[9]   PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP [J].
Macharis, C ;
Springael, J ;
De Brucker, K ;
Verbeke, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (02) :307-317
[10]   The impact of quality management orientation on maintenance performance [J].
Maletic, Damjan ;
Maletic, Matjaz ;
Gomiscek, Bostjan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (06) :1744-1754