Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:50
作者
Reeves, Rachel [1 ]
West, Elizabeth [1 ]
Barron, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Hlth & Social Care, London SE9 2UG, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Said Business Sch, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
关键词
Patient surveys; Patient experience; Patient satisfaction; Hospitals; Inpatients; Quality improvement; Patient-centred care; QUALITY-IMPROVEMENT; NATIONAL-SURVEY; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-13-259
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: England's extensive NHS patient survey programme has not fulfilled government promises of widespread improvements in patients' experiences, and media reports of poor nursing care in NHS hospitals are increasingly common. Impediments to the surveys' impact on the quality of nursing care may include: the fact that they are not ward-specific, so nurses claim "that doesn't happen on my ward"; nurses' scepticism about the relevance of patient feedback to their practice; and lack of prompt communication of results. The surveys' impact could be increased by: conducting ward-specific surveys; returning results to ward staff more quickly; including patients' written comments in reports; and offering nurses an opportunity to discuss the feedback. Very few randomised trials have been conducted to test the effectiveness of patient feedback on quality improvement and there have been few, if any, published trials of ward-specific patient surveys. Methods: Over two years, postal surveys of recent inpatients were conducted at four-monthly intervals in 18 wards in two NHS Trusts in England. Wards were randomly allocated to Basic Feedback (ward-specific printed patient survey results including patients' written comments sent to nurses by letter); Feedback Plus (in addition to printed results, ward meetings to discuss results and plan improvements) or Control (no active feedback of survey results). Patient survey responses to questions about nursing care were used to compute wards' average Nursing Care Scores at each interval. Nurses' reactions to the patient feedback were recorded. Results: Conducting ward-level surveys and delivering ward-specific results was feasible. Ward meetings were effective for engaging nurses and challenging scepticism and patients' written comments stimulated interest. 4,236 (47%) patients returned questionnaires. Nursing Care Scores improved more for Feedback Plus than Basic Feedback or Control (difference between Control and Feedback Plus = 8.28 +/- 7.2 (p = 0.02)). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that facilitated patient feedback can improve patients' experiences such that a full trial is justified. These findings suggest that merely informing nurses of patient survey results in writing does not stimulate improvements, even if results are disaggregated by ward, but the addition of ward meetings had an important and significant impact.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, Survey Methodology
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, CREAT PAT LED NHS DE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, NEW NHS MOD DEP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
  • [6] [Anonymous], BRIT MED J
  • [7] Boyd J., 2006, 2006 INPATIENTS IMPO
  • [8] Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital
    Boyer, Laurent
    Francois, Patrice
    Doutre, Elisabeth
    Weil, Georges
    Labarere, Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 18 (05) : 359 - 364
  • [9] NATIONAL SURVEY OF HOSPITAL PATIENTS
    BRUSTER, S
    JARMAN, B
    BOSANQUET, N
    WESTON, D
    ERENS, R
    DELBANCO, TL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6968) : 1542 - 1546
  • [10] Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
    Campbell, M
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Haines, A
    Kinmonth, AL
    Sandercock, P
    Spiegelhalter, D
    Tyrer, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262): : 694 - 696