Effects of corporate social responsibility considering emission restrictions

被引:28
作者
Chen, You-hua [1 ]
Nie, Pu-yan [2 ]
Wang, Chan [2 ]
Meng, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Sch Finance, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Dept Accounting, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental responsibility; Social concern; Social welfare; Regulation; DUOPOLY COMPETITION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; QUALITY; CSR; GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; POLLUTION; SUBSIDIES; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.002
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Emission restriction reduces total emission and protects environment. With game theory model, this paper investigates firm's corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices by taking emission restriction into account. CSR means a firm care about consumer surplus and environment pollution result in greenhouse gas emission in this study. All the effects of CSR practices, emission restriction and their interactions on firms' strategies are captured under duopoly Cournot competition. Some interesting conclusions are achieved. Firstly, the firm subjects to emission restriction prices lower than its profit maximum (PM) rival. Secondly, if the CSR firm is subject to emission restriction, social concern has no effect on firms' prices, outputs, profits and social welfare. Thirdly, social welfare decreases with product substitutability. Interestingly, when the CSR firm's emission restriction is non-binding, both CSR firm's profits and social welfare has inverse U-shaped relationships with social concern. Finally, this paper finds that the optimal level of social concern under the status that CSR firm aims to achieve maximum profits is lower than that under the condition the CSR firms aim to obtain maximum social welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 131
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   Corporate Social Responsibility, Durable-Goods and Firm Profitability [J].
Goering, Gregory E. .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2010, 31 (07) :489-496
[22]  
Goering GregoryE., 2008, ECON SYST, P326
[23]   Market-based environmental governance and public resources in Alberta, Canada [J].
Hackett, Ryan .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 15 :174-180
[24]   The role of CSR in promoting companies' energy-saving actions in two Asian cities [J].
Hori, Shiro ;
Shinozaki, Mami ;
Nogata, Daisuke ;
Fujita, Toshiyuki .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 :116-121
[25]   A novel summarization technique for the support of resolving multi-criteria decision making problems [J].
Huang, Tony Cheng-Kui ;
Chen, Yen-Liang ;
Chang, Ting-Hao .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 79 :109-124
[26]   Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Kitzmueller, Markus ;
Shimshack, Jay .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2012, 50 (01) :51-84
[27]   The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development [J].
Kolk, Ans .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2016, 51 (01) :23-34
[28]  
Kopel M., 2011, STRATEGIC CSR SPILLO
[29]   Socially responsible firms and endogenous choice of strategic incentives [J].
Kopel, Michael ;
Brand, Bjoern .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (03) :982-989
[30]   Sustainability: new strategic thinking for business [J].
Kopnina, Helen .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (01) :27-43