Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing

被引:31
作者
Bulakci, Mesut [1 ]
Kalelioglu, Tuba [1 ]
Bulakci, Betul Bozkurt [2 ]
Kiris, Adem [1 ]
机构
[1] Haseki Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, TR-34096 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Family Med, Istanbul Fac Med, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Drug smuggling; Body packer; Computed tomography; X-ray; Digestive tract; Cocaine; ILLICIT DRUGS; COCAINE; PACKETS; CT; OBSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Radiologists and other clinicians are facing an increasing number of illegal drug-related medical conditions. We aimed to draw attention to this growing global problem and to highlight some of the important points related to diagnosis and follow-up of body packing. We compare the diagnostic performance of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) and abdomen X-ray for the detection of drug-filled packets. Materials and methods: Sixty-seven suspects, who underwent both CT and X-ray examinations, have been included in the study. All MDCT and X-ray images were independently and retrospectively reviewed by two observers with different degrees of experience in abdomen imaging. Fifty-two of them were identified as body packers finally. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: Two types of packets with different characteristics were identified in all body packers. Type 1 packets (solid-state drug) were found in 41 patients and type 2 packets (liquid cocaine) in 11 patients. All statistical analyses concern the detection of any packets. That is, the whole evaluation has been performed per patient. Sensitivity/specificity values of type 1 and type 2 packets for MDCT were 100-98%/100-100% and 100-100%/100-100%, respectively. Besides, sensitivity/specificity values of type 1 and type 2 packets for X-ray were 93-90%/100-91% and 64-45%/73-71%, respectively. In addition, interobserver agreements for detection of any packets were excellent (kappa = 0.96) and good (kappa = 0.75) for interpretation of MDCT and X-ray, respectively. Conclusion: Unenhanced MDCT is a fast, accurate and easily used diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for the exact diagnosis of body packing. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1248 / 1254
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Aldrighetti L, 1993, Minerva Chir, V48, P1233
[2]   Role of radiology in a national initiative to interdict drug smuggling: The Dutch experience [J].
Algra, Paul R. ;
Brogdon, Byron G. ;
Marugg, Roque C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (02) :331-336
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[4]   Pediatric body packing - Drug smuggling reaches a new low [J].
Beno, S ;
Calello, D ;
Baluffi, A ;
Henretig, FM .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2005, 21 (11) :744-746
[5]   Packers, pushers and stuffers-managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review [J].
Booker, R. J. ;
Smith, J. E. ;
Rodger, M. P. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (05) :316-320
[6]  
Brown JA, 2002, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V53, P84
[7]   Colonic perforation: A lethal consequence of cannabis body packing [J].
Cawich, Shamir O. ;
Downes, Ross ;
Martin, Allie C. ;
Evans, Necia R. ;
Mitchell, Derek I. G. ;
Williams, Eric .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (05) :269-271
[8]   Cocaine body packing in pregnancy [J].
Cordero, Dwight R. ;
Medina, Carlos ;
Helfgott, Andrew .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (03) :323-325
[9]   Diagnosis of Heroin Body Packing Using Computed Tomography [J].
de Beer, S. A. ;
Fa-Si-Oen, P. R. .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (05) :450-451
[10]  
DEITEL M, 1973, CAN MED ASSOC J, V109, P211