Integrating students' perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors

被引:60
作者
Van Wart, Montgomery [1 ]
Ni, Anna [1 ]
Medina, Pamela [1 ]
Canelon, Jesus [1 ]
Kordrostami, Melika [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Dev JHB Coll Business & Publ Adm, 5500 Univ Pkwy, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
关键词
Online education; Online teaching; Student perceptions; Online quality; Teaching presence; Cognitive presence; Student presence; SOCIAL PRESENCE; CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION; FACULTY PERCEPTIONS; FLIPPED CLASSROOMS; TEACHING ONLINE; SELF-EFFICACY; SATISFACTION; EDUCATION; COMMUNITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article reports on a large-scale (n = 987), exploratory factor analysis study incorporating various concepts identified in the literature as critical success factors for online learning from the students' perspective, and then determines their hierarchical significance. Seven factors--Basic Online Modality, Instructional Support, Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Online Social Comfort, Online Interactive Modality, and Social Presence--were identified as significant and reliable. Regression analysis indicates the minimal factors for enrollment in future classes-when students consider convenience and scheduling-were Basic Online Modality, Cognitive Presence, and Online Social Comfort. Students who accepted or embraced online courses on their own merits wanted a minimum of Basic Online Modality, Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Online Social Comfort, and Social Presence. Students, who preferred face-to-face classes and demanded a comparable experience, valued Online Interactive Modality and Instructional Support more highly. Recommendations for online course design, policy, and future research are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 94 条
[51]  
Legon R., 2019, CHLOE 3 NUMBERS
[52]   Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments [J].
Liaw, Shu-Sheng ;
Huang, Hsiu-Mei .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 60 (01) :14-24
[53]   A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students [J].
Lu, Fletcher ;
Lemonde, Manon .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (05) :963-973
[54]   Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: a systematic review of flipped classroom research [J].
Lundin, Mona ;
Rensfeldt, Annika Bergviken ;
Hillman, Thomas ;
Lantz-Andersson, Annika ;
Peterson, Louise .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 15
[55]  
Macon D.K., 2011, Student satisfaction with online courses versus traditional courses: A meta-analysis
[56]  
Mann JT., 2012, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, V15, P1
[57]   Nuanced Perspectives about Online Teaching: Mid-Career and Senior Faculty Voices Reflecting on Academic Work in the Digital Age [J].
Mansbach J. ;
Austin A.E. .
Innovative Higher Education, 2018, 43 (4) :257-272
[58]   A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL OF PREDICTORS FOR EFFECTIVE ONLINE LEARNING [J].
Marks, Ronald B. ;
Sibley, Stanley D. ;
Arbaugh, J. B. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2005, 29 (04) :531-563
[59]   Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses [J].
Martin, Florence ;
Wang, Chuang ;
Sadaf, Ayesha .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 37 :52-65
[60]   Chalk and talk versus flipped learning: A case study [J].
Maycock, Keith W. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2019, 35 (01) :121-126