Integrating students' perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors

被引:60
作者
Van Wart, Montgomery [1 ]
Ni, Anna [1 ]
Medina, Pamela [1 ]
Canelon, Jesus [1 ]
Kordrostami, Melika [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Dev JHB Coll Business & Publ Adm, 5500 Univ Pkwy, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
关键词
Online education; Online teaching; Student perceptions; Online quality; Teaching presence; Cognitive presence; Student presence; SOCIAL PRESENCE; CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION; FACULTY PERCEPTIONS; FLIPPED CLASSROOMS; TEACHING ONLINE; SELF-EFFICACY; SATISFACTION; EDUCATION; COMMUNITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article reports on a large-scale (n = 987), exploratory factor analysis study incorporating various concepts identified in the literature as critical success factors for online learning from the students' perspective, and then determines their hierarchical significance. Seven factors--Basic Online Modality, Instructional Support, Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Online Social Comfort, Online Interactive Modality, and Social Presence--were identified as significant and reliable. Regression analysis indicates the minimal factors for enrollment in future classes-when students consider convenience and scheduling-were Basic Online Modality, Cognitive Presence, and Online Social Comfort. Students who accepted or embraced online courses on their own merits wanted a minimum of Basic Online Modality, Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Online Social Comfort, and Social Presence. Students, who preferred face-to-face classes and demanded a comparable experience, valued Online Interactive Modality and Instructional Support more highly. Recommendations for online course design, policy, and future research are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 94 条
[21]   Personality, learning, and satisfaction in fully online academic courses [J].
Cohen, Anat ;
Baruth, Orit .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 72 :1-12
[22]  
Crews T., 2014, Higher Education Studies, V4, P38, DOI 10.5539/hes.v4n3p38
[23]   Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: a comparison of four discussion strategies [J].
Darabi, A. ;
Arrastia, M. C. ;
Nelson, D. W. ;
Cornille, T. ;
Liang, X. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2011, 27 (03) :216-227
[24]   What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Henderson, Michael ;
Mahoney, Paige ;
Phillips, Michael ;
Ryan, Tracii ;
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) :25-36
[25]   Unfitting, uncomfortable, unacademic: a sociological reading of an interactive mobile phone app in university lectures [J].
Drew, Christopher ;
Mann, Amandeep .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 15
[26]   The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation [J].
Eom, Sean B. ;
Wen, H. Joseph ;
Ashill, Nicholas .
DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2006, 4 (02) :215-235
[27]   Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study [J].
Espasa, Anna ;
Meneses, Julio .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 59 (03) :277-292
[28]   A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences [J].
Farrell, Orna ;
Brunton, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 17 (01)
[29]   Students' perceptions on distance education: A multinational study [J].
Fidalgo, Patricia ;
Thormann, Joan ;
Kulyk, Oleksandr ;
Lencastre, Jose Alberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 17 (01)
[30]   The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis based on professors' and students' assessment in the educational field [J].
Flores, Oscar ;
del-Arco, Isabel ;
Silva, Patricia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 13