Bilateral decompression and intervertebral fusion via unilateral fenestration for complex lumbar spinal stenosis with a mobile microendoscopic technique

被引:16
|
作者
Xu, Baoshan [1 ]
Xu, Haiwei [1 ]
Ma, Xinlong [1 ]
Liu, Yue [1 ]
Yang, Qiang [1 ]
Jiang, Hongfeng [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Ji, Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Spine Surg, 406 Jie Fang Nan Rd, Tianjin 300211, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complications; endoscopic surgery; intervertebral disk displacement; lumbar spine; spinal stenosis; CANAL STENOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000009715
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
For complex lumbar spinal stenosis, using of endoscopy techniquemayprovide clear vision with less invasive dissection of paravertebral muscle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of bilateral decompression and intervertebral fusion via unilateral fenestration for complex lumbar spinal stenosis using mobile microendoscopic discectomy (MMED) technique. A total of 61 patients with complex lumbar spinal stenosis (lumbar canal stenosis combined with degenerative spondylolisthesis, instability, and scoliosis) were treated with this procedure. Patients with isolated lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis greater than grade II were excluded. The index levels included L4/5 in 52 patients, L5/S1 in 6 patients, L3-L5 in 2 patients and L4-S1 in 1 patient. The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was 42.6 +/- 10.2, lumbar visual analog scale (VAS) score was 6.1 +/- 4.2, and leg VAS score was 7.1 +/- 5.1. During the operation, ipsilateral enlarged fenestration was made using the MMED technique. The disc and cartilage endplate were thoroughly removed, and the contralateral ligamentum flavum and the inner layer of lamina were undercut to release the contralateral nerve root. The intervertebral space was released and prepared, followed by bone grafting and cage insertion. Percutaneous pedicle system was used for reduction and fixation. The operative time and blood loss were recorded, and patients were followed-up for at least 3 years (36-48 months, average 41 months) to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The procedure was successful in all patients, with no nerve injury or conversion to open operation. The mean operative time was 120minutes (range, 100-180minutes), with a mean blood loss of 100 mL (range, 50- 200 mL). Postoperative x-ray and CT showed sufficient decompression and improvement of spinal alignment. At 3 years after surgery, the ODI scores, lumbar and leg VAS scores decreased from preoperative 42.6 +/- 10.2, 6.1 +/- 4.2, and 7.1 +/- 5.1 to 8.6 +/- 7.0, 1.8 +/- 1.3, and 0.9 0.6, respectively (P=.00 for each comparison). The clinical results were excellent in 36 cases, good in 23, and fair in 2, according to the MacNab scale. The procedure of bilateral decompression and intervertebral fusion via unilateral fenestration using the MMED technique can provide satisfactory clinical results for complex lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microscopic Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Kaptan, Hulagu
    Kasimcan, Omur
    Ozyoruk, Safak
    Yilmaz, Murat
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (11) : 742 - 747
  • [2] Efficacy of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis
    Cavusoglu, Halit
    Turkmenoglu, Osman
    Kaya, Ramazan Alper
    Tuncer, Cengiz
    Colak, Ibrahim
    Sahin, Yueksel
    Aydin, Yunus
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 17 (02) : 100 - 108
  • [3] Unilateral fenestration in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Mackay, DC
    Wheelwright, EF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 12 (06) : 556 - 558
  • [4] Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Geng, Bin
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    Xia, Ya-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (02) : 641 - 650
  • [5] Bilateral decompression of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis through a unilateral approach
    Haba, K
    Ikeda, M
    Soma, M
    Yamashima, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 12 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [6] Biportal versus uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis
    He, Bang -lin
    Zhu, Zhi-cheng
    Lin, Li-qun
    Sun, Ji-fu
    Huang, Yong-hui
    Meng, Chen
    Sun, Yan
    Zhang, Guang-cheng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [7] Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hansraj, KK
    O'Leary, PF
    Cammisa, FP
    Hall, JC
    Fras, CI
    Cohen, MS
    Dorey, FJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (384) : 18 - 25
  • [8] Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (03):
  • [9] Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral-Approach Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Jiang, Ye
    Li, Chen
    Yuan, Lu-tao
    Luo, Cong
    Wu, Shao-shuai
    Mao, Yu-hang
    Xu, Fulin
    Yu, Yong
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2024, (204):
  • [10] Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Spinal Canal Decompression for Lumbar Stenosis: A Technical Note
    Moisi, Marc
    Fisahn, Christian
    Tkachenko, Lara
    Tubbs, R. Shane
    Ginat, Daniel
    Grunert, Peter
    Jeyamohan, Shiveindra
    Reintjes, Stephen
    Ajayi, Olaide
    Page, Jeni
    Oskouian, Rod J.
    Hanscom, David
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (05):