A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production

被引:25
|
作者
Rahman, Wasel-Ur [1 ]
Patel, Madhumita [1 ,2 ]
Kurian, Vinoj [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Indian Sch Mines, Indian Inst Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Dhanbad, Bihar, India
关键词
Intermediate pyrolysis; Transportation fuels; Comparative techno-economic model; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Decentralized; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL PRODUCTION; COMBINED HEAT; JET FUEL; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE LIQUID; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115877
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The conversion of municipal solid waste (MSW) to transportation fuels can be an attractive route to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation and municipal sectors. Thermochemical conversion routes like hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), fast pyrolysis (FP), and intermediate pyrolysis (IP) have been shown to be adept at converting organic dominant MSW into bio-crude or bio-oil. However, to produce compatible transportation grade fuels, it is necessary to upgrade the intermediate product (bio-crude or bio-oil) from all the processes, the extent of which differs depending on the process. Moreover, depending on the conversion technique, the production configuration can be either centralized or decentralized. In a centralized system, feed is transported to a facility to produce the intermediate and upgrade it (on-site upgrading), while in a decentralized system, the intermediate is produced elsewhere and transported to an upgrading facility (off-site upgrading).. Four scenarios were developed and modeled to compare the cost of production of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from bio-crudes produced from HTL, FP, and IP.. The scenarios are: 1) a centralized HTL plant (C-HTL); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 2) a centralized FP plant (C-FP); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 3) a decentralized FP plant (D-FP); 50 dry t per day; off-site upgrading, and 4) a decentralized IP plant; 12 dry t per day; off-site upgrading.. Jet fuel was the primary fuel for comparison and the production costs were calculated to be $ 0.72, $ 0.85, $ 1.04, and $ 0.81 per liter for the C-HTL, the C-FP, the D-FP, and the D-IP plants, respectively. Secondary products (gasoline and diesel) can be produced alongside in cost ranges of $ 0.97 - $ 1.40 per liter and $ 1.02 - $ 1.47 per liter, respectively. The information conveyed in this study helps to identify the potential of thermochemical conversion processes to produce transportation fuels at competitive prices. The critical barriers to adopt such large-scale production processes and the opportunities of small-scale decentralized production are also mentioned. The outcomes of this study can be used to direct research and investment to address the major roadblocks that are slowing the extensive development of these technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB)
    Yi Herng Chan
    Raymond R. Tan
    Suzana Yusup
    Hon Loong Lam
    Armando T. Quitain
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 1759 - 1768
  • [42] Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB)
    Chan, Yi Herng
    Tan, Raymond R.
    Yusup, Suzana
    Lam, Hon Loong
    Quitain, Armando T.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1759 - 1768
  • [43] Machine-learning-aided life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge for bio-oil production
    Zhou, Junhui
    Chen, Jiefeng
    Zhang, Weijin
    Tong, Yin
    Liu, Shengqiang
    Xu, Donghai
    Leng, Lijian
    Li, Hailong
    ENERGY, 2025, 319
  • [44] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of microwave co-pyrolysis of food waste and low-density polyethylene
    Neha, Shukla
    Ramesh, Kondragunta Prasanna Kumar
    Remya, Neelancherry
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 52
  • [45] Uncertainty analysis for techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of wet waste hydrothermal liquefaction with centralized upgrading to produce fuel blendstocks
    Jiang, Yuan
    Mevawala, Chirag
    Li, Shuyun
    Schmidt, Andrew
    Billing, Justin
    Thorson, Michael
    Snowden-Swan, Lesley
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (03):
  • [46] Chemical structure analysis and fast micro-pyrolysis study of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal treatment of municipal solid waste
    Lin, Yousheng
    Ge, Ya
    He, Qing
    Chen, Baiman
    Xiao, Hanmin
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (02) : 270 - 278
  • [47] Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    O'Boyle, Marnie
    Li, Loretta Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 346
  • [48] Novel techniques in bio-oil production through catalytic pyrolysis of waste biomass: Effective parameters, innovations, and techno-economic analysis
    Rezvani, Behnam
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2025,
  • [49] Production of Hydrocarbon Fuel Using Two-Step Torrefaction and Fast Pyrolysis of Pine. Part 1: Techno-economic Analysis
    Winjobi, Olumide
    Shonnard, David R.
    Zhou, Wen
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (06): : 4529 - 4540
  • [50] Techno-economic performance analysis of biofuel production and miniature electric power generation from biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading
    Shemfe, Mobolaji B.
    Gu, Sai
    Ranganathan, Panneerselvam
    FUEL, 2015, 143 : 361 - 372