A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production

被引:25
|
作者
Rahman, Wasel-Ur [1 ]
Patel, Madhumita [1 ,2 ]
Kurian, Vinoj [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Indian Sch Mines, Indian Inst Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Dhanbad, Bihar, India
关键词
Intermediate pyrolysis; Transportation fuels; Comparative techno-economic model; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Decentralized; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL PRODUCTION; COMBINED HEAT; JET FUEL; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE LIQUID; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115877
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The conversion of municipal solid waste (MSW) to transportation fuels can be an attractive route to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation and municipal sectors. Thermochemical conversion routes like hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), fast pyrolysis (FP), and intermediate pyrolysis (IP) have been shown to be adept at converting organic dominant MSW into bio-crude or bio-oil. However, to produce compatible transportation grade fuels, it is necessary to upgrade the intermediate product (bio-crude or bio-oil) from all the processes, the extent of which differs depending on the process. Moreover, depending on the conversion technique, the production configuration can be either centralized or decentralized. In a centralized system, feed is transported to a facility to produce the intermediate and upgrade it (on-site upgrading), while in a decentralized system, the intermediate is produced elsewhere and transported to an upgrading facility (off-site upgrading).. Four scenarios were developed and modeled to compare the cost of production of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from bio-crudes produced from HTL, FP, and IP.. The scenarios are: 1) a centralized HTL plant (C-HTL); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 2) a centralized FP plant (C-FP); 2000 dry t per day; on-site upgrading, 3) a decentralized FP plant (D-FP); 50 dry t per day; off-site upgrading, and 4) a decentralized IP plant; 12 dry t per day; off-site upgrading.. Jet fuel was the primary fuel for comparison and the production costs were calculated to be $ 0.72, $ 0.85, $ 1.04, and $ 0.81 per liter for the C-HTL, the C-FP, the D-FP, and the D-IP plants, respectively. Secondary products (gasoline and diesel) can be produced alongside in cost ranges of $ 0.97 - $ 1.40 per liter and $ 1.02 - $ 1.47 per liter, respectively. The information conveyed in this study helps to identify the potential of thermochemical conversion processes to produce transportation fuels at competitive prices. The critical barriers to adopt such large-scale production processes and the opportunities of small-scale decentralized production are also mentioned. The outcomes of this study can be used to direct research and investment to address the major roadblocks that are slowing the extensive development of these technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Robert C.
    Hu, Guiping
    FUEL, 2013, 106 : 463 - 469
  • [2] Characterization of municipal solid waste residues for hydrothermal liquefaction into liquid transportation fuels
    Okoligwe, Onyinyechi
    Radu, Tanja
    Leaper, Mark C.
    Wagner, Jonathan L.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 140 : 133 - 142
  • [3] Techno-economic assessment of the effect of torrefaction on fast pyrolysis of pine
    Winjobi, Olumide
    Shonnard, David R.
    Bar-Ziv, Ezra
    Zhou, Wen
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2016, 10 (02): : 117 - 128
  • [4] A techno-economic comparison of Fischer-Tropsch and fast pyrolysis as ways of utilizing sugar cane bagasse in transportation fuels production
    Michailos, Stavros
    Parker, David
    Webb, Colin
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 118 : 206 - 214
  • [5] Techno-economic assessment of upgraded pyrolysis bio-oils for future marine fuels
    Letoffet, Antoine
    Campion, Nicolas
    Bohme, Moritz
    Jensen, Claus Dalsgaard
    Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
    Clausen, Lasse Rongaard
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 306
  • [6] Techno-economic analysis of microalgae-based liquid fuels production from wastewater via hydrothermal liquefaction and hydroprocessing
    Ranganathan, Panneerselvam
    Savithri, Sivaraman
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 284 : 256 - 265
  • [7] Comparative techno-economic analysis of biofuel production through gasification, thermal liquefaction and pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse
    Ramirez, Jerome A.
    Rainey, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 513 - 527
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis of transportation fuels from defatted microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction and hydroprocessing
    Ou, Longwen
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Robert C.
    Wright, Mark M.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 72 : 45 - 54
  • [9] Techno-economic analysis of monosaccharide production via fast pyrolysis of lignocellulose
    Zhang, Yanan
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 127 : 358 - 365
  • [10] Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of in situ and ex situ fast pyrolysis for biofuel production
    Li, Boyan
    Ou, Longwen
    Dang, Qi
    Meyer, Pimphan
    Jones, Susanne
    Brown, Robert
    Wright, Mark
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 49 - 56