Test-retest reliability and circadian performance variability of a 15-s Wingate Anaerobic Test

被引:11
|
作者
Hachana, Younes [1 ]
Attia, Ahmed [1 ]
Chaabene, Helmi [1 ]
Gallas, Syrine [2 ]
Sassi, Radhouane Haj [3 ]
Dotan, Raffy [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manouba, Inst Super Sport & Educ Phys, Ksar Said, Tunisia
[2] Fac Med Monastir, Physiol Lab, Monastir, Tunisia
[3] Inst Super Sport & Educ Phys, Le Kef, Tunisia
[4] Brock Univ, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
reliability; circadian variability; Wingate anaerobic test; peak power; POWER; RHYTHMS; EXERCISE; MUSCLE; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/09291016.2011.599634
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and circadian variability of an abbreviated, 15-s version of the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT(15)). A total of 35 healthy, physically-active subjects (20.2 +/- 3.6 years) performed two WAnT(15) tests, 24 h apart (Reliability phase; n = 18), and on a different occasion performed morning and evening WAnT(15) tests, (Circadian phase; n = 17). In the reliability phase, tests 1-2 differences and intra class correlations for peak power output (PPO) and mean power output (MPO) were 0.22% and 0.997 and 0.38% and 0.996, respectively. The fatigue index (FI) was not found reliable. In the circadian phase, only PPO significantly changed between morning and evening sessions (3.0%, p = 0.021). These findings suggest that the shortened WAnT(15) is a highly reliable anaerobic power test with circadian variability <50% that reported for the original, 30-s WAnT, in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 421
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Test-retest reliability
    Versino, M
    Colnaghi, S
    Callieco, R
    Cosi, V
    FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2001, 16 (04) : 299 - 309
  • [42] Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis
    Henriksen, M
    Lund, H
    Moe-Nilssen, R
    Bliddal, H
    Danneskiod-Samsoe, B
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2004, 19 (03) : 288 - 297
  • [43] The Test-Retest Reliability of the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR)
    Tang, Jessica
    Edwards, Thomas
    Crowston, Jonathan G.
    Sarossy, Marc
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 3 (06):
  • [44] Moderators of Test-Retest Reliability in Implicit and Explicit Attitudes
    Axt, Jordan
    Roy, Eliane
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, : 567 - 593
  • [45] Test-retest reliability in fMRI: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the variability
    McGonigle, David J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (02) : 1116 - 1120
  • [46] Test-Retest Reliability of the Twin Cities Walking Survey
    Forsyth, Ann
    Oakes, J. Michael
    Schmitz, Kathryn H.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2009, 6 (01) : 119 - 131
  • [47] Reliability of the Norwegian version of PainDETECT: a test-retest study
    Myhre, Anette Melsom
    Strand, Liv Inger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2023, 25 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [48] Test-retest reliability of the personality diagnostic questionnaire: Revised
    Uehara, T
    Sakado, K
    Sato, T
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 1997, 51 (06) : 369 - 372
  • [49] Otoacoustic emission measurements: a test-retest reliability study
    Yagcioglu, Aysenur Aykul
    Ozturk, Burak
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [50] Test-retest reliability of the multidimensional anxiety scale for children
    March, JS
    Sullivan, K
    Parker, J
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1999, 13 (04) : 349 - 358