Measurement of fetal fat in utero in normal and diabetic pregnancies using magnetic resonance imaging

被引:27
作者
Anblagan, D. [1 ]
Deshpande, R. [2 ]
Jones, N. W. [2 ]
Costigan, C. [1 ]
Bugg, G. [2 ]
Raine-Fenning, N. [3 ]
Gowland, P. A. [1 ]
Mansell, P. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sir Peter Mansfield Magnet Resonance Ctr, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Clin Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biomed Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[5] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Nottingham, England
关键词
body composition; diabetes; fat; fetus; magnetic resonance imaging; pregnancy; WEIGHT ESTIMATION; BODY-COMPOSITION; MACROSOMIA; PREDICTION; BIRTH; INFANTS; MOTHERS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.12382
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure fetal fat volume in utero, and to study fetal growth in women with and without diabetes in view of the increased prevalence of macrosomia in the former. Methods We studied 26 pregnant women, 14 with pre-gestational diabetes and 12 non-diabetic controls. Fetal assessment took place at 24 weeks' gestation and again at 34 weeks by standard ultrasound biometry followed by MRI at 1.5T. Fetal fat volume was determined from T1-weighted water-suppressed images using a semi-automated approach based on pixel intensity and taking into account partial volume effects. Fetal volume was also determined from the MRI images. Fetal weight was calculated using published fat and lean tissue densities. Results There was little fetal fat at 24 weeks' gestation, but at 34 weeks the fetal fat content was considerably higher in the women with diabetes, with a mean fat content of 1090 +/- 417cm(3) compared with 541 +/- 348cm(3) in the controls (P=0.006). Measurements of fetal fat volume showed low intra- and interobserver variability at 34 weeks, with intraclass correlation coefficients consistently above 0.99. Birth-weight centile correlated with fetal fat volume (R-2=0.496, P<0.001), percentage of fetal fat (R-2=0.362, P=0.008) and calculated fetal weight (R-2=0.492, P<0.001) at 34 weeks. Conclusions MRI appears to be a promising tool for the determination of fetal fat, body composition and weight in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy. Copyright (c) 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION BY ECHO-PLANAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
BAKER, PN ;
JOHNSON, IR ;
GOWLAND, PA ;
HYKIN, J ;
HARVEY, PR ;
FREEMAN, A ;
ADAMS, V ;
WORTHINGTON, BS ;
MANSFIELD, P .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8898) :644-645
[2]   Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging [J].
Bennini, J. R. ;
Marussi, E. F. ;
Barini, R. ;
Faro, C. ;
Peralta, C. F. A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (04) :426-433
[3]  
Berger-Kulemann V, 2012, J PERINAT MED, V40, P179, DOI [10.1515/JPM.2011.122, 10.1515/jpm.2011.122]
[4]   Fetal body composition [J].
Bernstein, I .
CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2005, 8 (06) :613-617
[5]  
BERNSTEIN IM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P561
[6]   Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome [J].
Bjorstad, Astrid R. ;
Irgens-Hansen, Kaja ;
Daltveit, Anne Kjersti ;
Irgens, Lorentz M. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (05) :664-669
[7]   Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
West, DJ ;
Scardo, JA ;
Boyd, JM ;
Joiner, J ;
Hendrix, NW .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (05) :639-642
[8]   Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review [J].
Coomarasamy, A ;
Connock, M ;
Thornton, J ;
Khan, KS .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (11) :1461-1466
[9]   Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands [J].
Evers, IN ;
de Valk, HW ;
Visser, GHA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7445) :915-918A
[10]   What is the value of ultrasound soft tissue measurements in the prediction of abnormal fetal growth? [J].
Farah, N. ;
Stuart, B. ;
Donnelly, V. ;
Rafferty, G. ;
Turner, M. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 29 (06) :457-463