Trust, welfare, and political culture:: Explaining differences in national penal policies

被引:86
作者
Lappi-Seppala, Tapio [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst Legal Policy, Helsinki, Finland
来源
CRIME AND JUSTICE: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH, VOL 37 | 2008年 / 37卷
关键词
D O I
10.1086/525028
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Countries vary enormously in their punishment policies and practices. A nascent literature has begun to explain these differences. There are no simple explanations. Neither high or rising crime rates nor heightened public anxiety or severity explains why policies become tougher or are tougher in some places than in others. The most powerful predictors of moderation in policy and practices are high levels of confidence in fellow citizens and in government, strong welfare states, and consensus compared with conflict political systems. Other important factors include insulation of the legal system from politics, the way in which justice system personnel are trained, and the nature of the mass media.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 387
页数:75
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
AEBI MF, 2007, COUNCIL EUROPE SPACE
[2]  
Andenaes Johannes, 1974, Punishment and deterrence
[3]  
[Anonymous], BURDEN CRIME EU
[4]  
[Anonymous], CRIME JUSTICE REV RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EUROPEAN SOURCEBOOK
[6]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES PUNISHM
[7]  
[Anonymous], NEW PUNITIVENESS TRE
[8]   Decommodification and the worlds of welfare revisited [J].
Bambra, C .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2006, 16 (01) :73-80
[9]  
BECKETT K, 2001, MASS IMPRISONMENT SO
[10]   Cross-national measures of punitiveness [J].
Blumstein, A ;
Tonry, M ;
Van Ness, A .
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN WESTERN COUNTRIES, 1980-1999, 2005, 33 :347-376