Modeling the concept of majority opinion in group decision making

被引:80
作者
Pasi, G
Yager, RR
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, DISCO, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[2] Iona Coll, New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2005.07.006
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper the problem of group decision making is studied. One of the main issues in this context is to define a decision strategy which takes into account the individual opinions of the decision makers. The concept of majority plays in this context a key role: what is often needed is an overall opinion which synthesizes the opinions of the majority of the decision makers. The reduction of the individual values into a representative value (which we call the majority opinion) is usually performed through an aggregation process. Within fuzzy set theory the concept of majority can be expressed by a linguistic quantifier (such as most), which is formally defined as a fuzzy subset. In this paper we propose two distinct approaches to the definition of a majority opinion. We first consider the case where linguistic quantifiers are associated with aggregation operators which allow us to compute a majority opinion by aggregating the individual opinions. In this case the majority opinion corresponds to the aggregated value. To model this semantics of linguistic quantifiers the IOWA operators are used and a new proposal of definition of their weighting vector is presented. A second method is based on the consideration of the concept of majority as a vague concept. Based on this interpretation we propose a formalization of a fuzzy majority opinion as a fuzzy subset. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 414
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, POSSIBILITY THEORY
[2]   GENERALIZED QUANTIFIERS AND NATURAL-LANGUAGE [J].
BARWISE, J ;
COOPER, R .
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1981, 4 (02) :159-219
[3]  
BORDOGNA G, 1997, IEEE T SYSTEMS MAN C, V27
[4]   Generation of weighting triangles associated with aggregation functions [J].
Dept. of Math. and Computer Science, University of the Balearic Islands, Ctra. de Valldemossa, km 7.5, Palma de Mallorca, Spain .
International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, 2000, 8 (04) :417-451
[5]   COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GROUP DECISION METHODS [J].
FISHBURN, PC .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1971, 16 (06) :538-&
[6]   FUZZY INTEGRAL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING [J].
GRABISCH, M .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1995, 69 (03) :279-298
[7]   Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Verdegay, JL .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 79 (02) :175-190
[8]   A linguistic decision process in group decision making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Verdegay, JL .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1996, 5 (02) :165-176
[9]  
Kacprzyk J., 1992, An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems, P263
[10]  
Kacprzyk J., 1997, CONSENSUS FUZZINESS