How the collaborative work of farm to school can disrupt neoliberalism in public schools

被引:6
作者
Bisceglia, Andrea [1 ]
Hauver, Jennifer [2 ]
Berle, David [3 ]
Thompson, Jennifer Jo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Off Serv Learning, 1242 S Lumpkin St, Athens, GA 30605 USA
[2] Randolph Macon Coll, Dept Educ, POB 5005, Ashland, VA 23005 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Hort Dept, 1111 Miller Plant Sci Bldg,120 Carlton St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, 3111 Miller Plant Sci Bldg,120 Carlton St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Food systems education; Farm to school; Neoliberalism; Materiality; Affective labor; FOOD SYSTEMS EDUCATION; TO-SCHOOL; SOCIAL-CLASS; OLD SCHOOL; GARDENS; STUDENTS; AGROECOLOGY; CONSUMPTION; SOVEREIGNTY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-020-10128-3
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Farm to school (FTS) is a popular approach to food systems education in K-12 schools across the United States. FTS programs are highly heterogeneous, but generally include serving locally grown fruits and vegetables in school nutrition programs, planting and maintaining school gardens, and engaging students in garden and food-based learning across the school curriculum. While FTS has been promoted as a "win-win-win" for children, farmers, and communities, it has also been critiqued for reinscribing neoliberal trends (i.e., individualism, private funding, and volunteerism) that exacerbate social inequalities. Through a year-long, ethnographic study of FTS within one public middle school in the Southeast US, this paper contributes to these debates. Drawing upon theoretical frameworks of materiality and affective labor, we investigate how engagement with FTS activities can transform the social practice of everyday life in school for students, staff, and teachers. We find that FTS can reframe success in collaborative terms, engage the school around collective responsibility, and foster relationships across socioeconomic and racial difference. Although there is continued need to expand policies to ensure equitable funding for FTS, our research demonstrates that the hands-on work and collective subjectivities produced through FTS can mitigate the harms of neoliberalism and be a force for positive social change within a school.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 71
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Food sovereignty in US food movements: radical visions and neoliberal constraints
    Alkon, Alison Hope
    Mares, Teresa Marie
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2012, 29 (03) : 347 - 359
  • [2] From "old school" to "farm-to-school": Neoliberalization from the ground up
    Allen, Patricia
    Guthman, Julie
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2006, 23 (04) : 401 - 415
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Farm to School Grant Program | USDA-FNS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice
  • [6] [Anonymous], EXTENSION
  • [7] School Gardens Enhance Academic Performance and Dietary Outcomes in Children
    Berezowitz, Claire K.
    Yoder, Andrea B. Bontrager
    Schoeller, Dale A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2015, 85 (08) : 508 - 518
  • [8] Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
    Carlisle, Liz
    [J]. ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2015, 3
  • [9] Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence
    Chawla, Louise
    Keena, Kelly
    Pevec, Illene
    Stanley, Emily
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2014, 28 : 1 - 13
  • [10] Chomsky Noam., 1998, PROFIT PEOPLE NEOLIB