Comparing Short-term Complications of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion An Analysis of 6940 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Database

被引:42
|
作者
Khanna, Ryan [1 ]
Kim, Robert B. [1 ]
Lam, Sandi K. [2 ]
Cybulski, George R. [1 ]
Smith, Zachary A. [1 ]
Dahdaleh, Nader S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
ACDF; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; NSQIP; outpatient; inpatient; complication; readmission; reoperation; SPINE SURGERY; SAFETY; NSQIP; OUTCOMES; REMOVAL; DISC;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000499
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Multicenter propensity score-adjusted retrospective cohort study. Objective: To determine baseline 30-day complication rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and compare clinical complications for patients undergoing single-level ACDFs between inpatient and outpatient settings. Summary of Background Data: ACDF remains the most common procedure in the treatment of a variety of cervical disc pathologies, making it a focus of quality improvement initiatives. Outpatient single-level ACDFs are becoming more common and offer advantages including reducing nosocomial infections and costs, as well as improved patient satisfaction. Materials and Methods: The 2011-2013 NSQIP datasets were queried to identify all patients who underwent single-level ACDF procedures using current procedural terminology codes. Outpatient and inpatient cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity score analysis to assess short-term outcomes. The outcomes assessed included 30-day medical and surgical complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality. Results: In total, 6940 patients underwent a single-level ACDF with an overall complication rate of 4.2%. A total of 5162 patients (74.4%) had an inpatient hospital stay after surgery, whereas 1778 patients (25.6%) had outpatient surgery. After matching based on preoperative and operative characteristics to account for potential confounders, the overall complication rate was higher in the inpatient arm compared with the outpatient arm (2.5% vs. 1.2%; P = 0.003). The 30-day readmission rate was also higher but not significant in the inpatient group than the outpatient group (2.2% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.355). Mortality was the same with 0.1% in both groups (P = 0.564). Conclusions: Patients undergoing outpatient single-level ACDF had a lower 30-day complication rates than those undergoing it in the inpatient setting. Outpatient surgery for single-level ACDF is safe and a favorable option for suitable patients.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Godil, Saniya S.
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Parker, Scott L.
    Devin, Clinton J.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2015, 39 (06) : 1 - 5
  • [2] Outpatient Surgery Reduces Short-Term Complications in Lumbar Discectomy An Analysis of 4310 Patients From the ACS-NSQIP Database
    Pugely, Andrew J.
    Martin, Christopher T.
    Gao, Yubo
    Mendoza-Lattes, Sergio A.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (03) : 264 - 271
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    McAnany, Steven
    Goz, Vadim
    Koehler, Steven M.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (05) : 546 - 554
  • [4] Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion is Associated With Fewer Short-term Complications in One- and Two-level Cases A Propensity-adjusted Analysis
    Fu, Michael C.
    Gruskay, Jordan A.
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Derman, Peter B.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (14) : 1044 - 1049
  • [5] Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Mathew, Justin
    Vulapalli, Meghana M.
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Dyrszka, Marc D.
    Sardar, Zeeshan M.
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    Riew, K. Daniel
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (08) : 1183 - 1189
  • [6] Exclusion criteria for dysphagia for outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using inpatient data from a spine registry
    Aguilar, Daniel-Diaz
    Brara, Harsimran S.
    Rahman, Shayan
    Harris, Jessica
    Prentice, Heather A.
    Guppy, Kern H.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 180 : 28 - 33
  • [7] A Comparison of 30-Day Hospital Readmission and Complication Rates After Outpatient Versus Inpatient 1 and 2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: An Analysis of a Medicare Patient Sample
    Khalid, Syed, I
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Ni, Amelia
    Cheng, Joseph
    Bagley, Carlos
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : E233 - E239
  • [8] Perioperative Outcomes After Cervical Laminoplasty Versus Posterior Decompression and Fusion Analysis of 779 Patients in the ACS-NSQIP Database
    Varthi, Arya G.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Golinvaux, Nicholas S.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (05): : E226 - E232
  • [9] Costs of Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease An Analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence Database for Acute and Long-term Costs and Complications
    Radcliff, Kris
    Zigler, Jeff
    Zigler, Jack
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (08) : 521 - 529
  • [10] Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis
    Mansfield, Haley E.
    Canar, W. Jeffrey
    Gerard, Carter S.
    O'Toole, John E.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 37 (05)