Demand flow facilitates spontaneous breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in a pig model

被引:11
作者
van Heerde, Marc [1 ]
Roubik, Karel [2 ]
Kopelent, Vit [2 ]
Ploetz, Frans B. [1 ]
Markhorst, Dick G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Pediat Intens Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Biomed Engn, Kladno, Czech Republic
关键词
high-frequency ventilation; work of breathing; respiratory mechanics; mechanical ventilators; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; AIRWAY PRESSURE; LUNG; WORK; PERFUSION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e318196153b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Maintenance breathing is advocated in mechanical ventilation, which is difficult for the high-frequency oscillatory (HFO) ventilation. To facilitate spontaneous breathing during HFO ventilation, a demand flow system (DFS) was designed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the system. Design: Animal experiment. Setting: University animal laboratory. Subjects: Eight pigs (47-64 kg). Interventions: Lung injury was induced by lung lavage with normal saline. After spontaneous breathing was restored HFO ventilation was applied, in runs of 30 minutes, with continuous fresh gas flow (CF) or the DFS operated in two different setups. Pressure to regulate the DFS was sampled directly at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit (DFS) or between the endotracheal tube and measurement equipment at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube. In the end, animals were paralyzed. Breathing pattern, work of breathing, and gas exchange were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: HFO ventilation with demand flow decreased breathing frequency and increased tidal volume compared with CF. Comparing HFO modes CF, DFS, and DFSPROX, total pressure-time product (PTP) was 66 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (inter-quartile range 59-74), 64 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (50-72), and 51 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (41-63). Ventilator PTP was 36 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (32-42), 8.6 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (7.4-10), and 1 cm H2O.sec.min(-1) (-1.0 to 2.8). Oxygenation, evaluated by Pao(2), was preserved when spontaneous breathing was maintained and deteriorated when pigs were paralyzed. Ventilation, evaluated by Pao(2), improved with demand flow. Paco(2) increased when using continuous flow and during muscular paralysis. Conclusions: In moderately lung-injured anesthetized pigs during HFO ventilation, demand flow facilitated spontaneous breathing and augmented gas exchange. Demand flow decreased total breathing effort as quantified by PTP. Imposed work caused by the HFO ventilator appeared totally reduced by demand flow. (Grit Care Med 2009; 37:1068-1073)
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1073
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BAYDUR A, 1982, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V126, P788
[2]   Work of breathing [J].
Cabello, Belen ;
Mancebo, Jordi .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (09) :1311-1314
[3]   High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults [J].
Derdak, S ;
Mehta, S ;
Stewart, TE ;
Smith, T ;
Rogers, M ;
Buchman, TG ;
Carlin, B ;
Lowson, S ;
Granton, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (06) :801-808
[4]  
Derdak Stephen, 2005, Crit Care Med, V33, pS113, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000155787.26548.4C
[5]   High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for adult respiratory distress syndrome: Let's get it right this time! [J].
Froese, AB .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (06) :906-908
[6]  
GROTJOHAN HP, 1992, THESIS ERASMUS U ROT, P45
[7]  
Guyton AC, 2006, TXB MED PHYSL
[8]   Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on renal perfusion and function in patients with acute lung injury [J].
Hering, R ;
Peters, D ;
Zinserling, J ;
Wrigge, H ;
von Spiegel, T ;
Putensen, C .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (10) :1426-1433
[9]  
Imai Yumiko, 2005, Crit Care Med, V33, pS129, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000156793.05936.81
[10]   VARIABILITY OF PATIENT-VENTILATOR INTERACTION WITH PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE [J].
JUBRAN, A ;
VANDEGRAAFF, WB ;
TOBIN, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 152 (01) :129-136