Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Stab Wounds

被引:0
作者
Murry, Jason S. [1 ]
Hoang, David M. [1 ]
Ashragian, Sogol [1 ]
Liou, Doug Z. [1 ]
Barmparas, Galinos [1 ]
Chung, Rex [1 ]
Alban, Rodrigo F. [1 ]
Margulies, Daniel R. [1 ]
Ley, Eric J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Crit Care, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPY; TRAUMA; GUIDELINES; LAPAROTOMY; DIAPHRAGM; INJURIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Stab wounds (SW) to the abdomen traditionally require urgent exploration when associated with shock, evisceration, or peritonitis. Hemodynamically stable patients without evisceration may benefit from serial exams even with peritonitis. We compared patients taken directly to the operating room with abdominal SWs (ED-OR) to those admitted for serial exams (ADMIT). We retrospectively reviewed hemodynamically stable patients presenting with any abdominal SW between January 2000 and December 2012. Exclusions included evidence of evisceration, systolic blood pressure <= 110 mm Hg, or blood transfusion. NON-THER was defined as abdominal exploration without identification of intra-abdominal injury requiring repair. Of 142 patients included, 104 were ED-OR and 38 were ADMIT. When ED-OR was compared with ADMIT, abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score was higher (2.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.01) and hospital length of stay was longer (4.8 vs 3.3 days; P = 0.04). Incidence of NON-THER was higher in ED-OR cohort (71% vs 13%; P <= 0.001). In a regression model, ED-OR was a predictor of NON-THER (adjusted odds ratio 16.6; P < 0.001). One patient from ED-OR expired after complications from NON-THER. There were no deaths in the ADMIT group. For those patients with abdominal SWs who present with systolic blood pressure >= 110 mm Hg, no blood product transfusion in the emergency department and lacking evisceration, admission for serial abdominal exams may be preferred regardless of abdominal exam.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1038
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration [J].
Arikan, S ;
Kocakusak, A ;
Yucel, AF ;
Adas, G .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 58 (03) :526-532
[2]   Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma [J].
Biffl, Walter L. ;
Moore, Ernest E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 16 (06) :609-617
[3]   Hemodynamically "Stable" patients with peritonitis after penetrating abdominal trauma - Identifying those who are bleeding [J].
Brown, CVR ;
Velmahos, GC ;
Neville, AL ;
Rhee, P ;
Salim, A ;
Sangthong, B ;
Demetriades, D .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2005, 140 (08) :767-771
[4]   The role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal stab wounds [J].
Cherry, RA ;
Eachempati, SR ;
Hydo, LJ ;
Barie, PS .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2005, 15 (01) :14-17
[5]   Determining the need for laparotomy in penetrating torso trauma: A prospective study using triple-contrast enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography [J].
Chiu, WC ;
Shanmuganathan, K ;
Mirvis, SE ;
Scalea, TM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 51 (05) :860-868
[6]   Practice Management Guidelines for Selective Nonoperative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma [J].
Como, John J. ;
Bokhari, Faran ;
Chiu, William C. ;
Duane, Therese M. ;
Holevar, Michele R. ;
Tandoh, Margaret A. ;
Ivatury, Rao R. ;
Scalea, Thomas M. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (03) :721-733
[7]   Laparoscopy for triage of penetrating trauma: The decision to explore [J].
Ditmars, ML ;
Bongard, F .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 1996, 6 (05) :285-291
[8]   Laparoscopy is sufficient to exclude occult diaphragm injury after penetrating abdominal trauma [J].
Friese, RS ;
Coln, CE ;
Gentilello, LM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 58 (04) :789-792
[9]  
Greene W, 2011, J TRAUMA, V70, P413
[10]  
HASANIYA N, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P744