Systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction models for adults undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery

被引:15
|
作者
Reilly, Jennifer R. [1 ,2 ]
Gabbe, Belinda J. [3 ]
Brown, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Hodgson, Carol L. [3 ]
Myles, Paul S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Dept Anaesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Alfred Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
anaesthesia; mortality; outcome; perioperative; risk; risk prediction; surgery; PHYSICAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; P-POSSUM; PREOPERATIVE SCORE; PORTSMOUTH POSSUM; SURGICAL QUALITY; LABORATORY DATA;
D O I
10.1111/ans.16255
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Risk prediction tools can be used in the perioperative setting to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from increased surveillance and monitoring in the postoperative period, to aid shared decision-making, and to benchmark risk-adjusted hospital performance. We evaluated perioperative risk prediction tools relevant to an Australian context. Methods A systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction tools used for adults undergoing inpatient noncardiac surgery, published between 2011 and 2019 (following an earlier systematic review). We searched Medline via OVID using medical subject headings consistent with the three main areas of risk, surgery and mortality/morbidity. A similar search was conducted in Embase. Tools predicting morbidity but not mortality were excluded, as were those predicting a composite outcome that did not report predictive performance for mortality separately. Tools were also excluded if they were specifically designed for use in cardiac or other highly specialized surgery, emergency surgery, paediatrics or elderly patients. Results Literature search identified 2568 studies for screening, of which 19 studies identified 21 risk prediction tools for inclusion. Conclusion Four tools are candidates for adapting in the Australian context, including the Surgical Mortality Probability Model (SMPM), Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM), Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) and NZRISK. SORT has similar predictive performance to POSPOM, using only six variables instead of 17, contains all variables of the SMPM, and the original model developed in the UK has already been successfully adapted in New Zealand as NZRISK. Collecting the SORT and NZRISK variables in a national surgical outcomes study in Australia would present an opportunity to simultaneously investigate three of our four shortlisted models and to develop a locally valid perioperative mortality risk prediction model with high predictive performance.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 870
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An observational study of perioperative risk associated with aortic stenosis in non-cardiac surgery
    MacIntyre, P. A.
    Scott, M.
    Seigne, R.
    Clark, A.
    Deveer, F.
    Minchin, I.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2018, 46 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [22] Systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality risk prediction models in adult cardiac surgery
    Sinha, Shubhra
    Dimagli, Arnaldo
    Dixon, Lauren
    Gaudino, Mario
    Caputo, Massimo
    Vohra, Hunaid A.
    Angelini, Gianni
    Benedetto, Umberto
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 33 (05) : 673 - 686
  • [23] Perioperative aspirin therapy in non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wolff, Georg
    Navarese, Eliano Pio
    Brockmeyer, Maximilian
    Lin, Yingfeng
    Karathanos, Athanasios
    Kalodziejczak, Michalina
    Kubica, Jacek
    Polzin, Amin
    Zeus, Tobias
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Andreotti, Felicita
    Kelm, Malte
    Schulze, Volker
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 258 : 59 - 67
  • [24] Perioperative Care of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease for Non-cardiac Surgery
    Howard-Quijano K.
    Smith M.
    Schwarzenberger J.C.
    Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2013, 3 (3) : 144 - 150
  • [25] Perioperative Myocardial Injury After Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Redel-Traub, Gabriel
    Hausvater, Anais
    Armanious, Andrew
    Nicholson, Joseph
    Berger, Jeffrey
    Smilowitz, Nathaniel
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [26] Cardiac biomarkers in the prediction of risk in the non-cardiac surgery setting
    Biccard, B. M.
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Rodseth, R. N.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (05) : 484 - 493
  • [27] Perioperative adverse cardiac events and mortality after non-cardiac surgery: a multicenter study
    Choi, Byungjin
    Oh, Ah Ran
    Park, Jungchan
    Lee, Jong-Hwan
    Yang, Kwangmo
    Lee, Dong Yun
    Rhee, Sang Youl
    Kang, Sang -Soo
    Lee, Seung Do
    Lee, Sun Hack
    Jeong, Chang Won
    Park, Bumhee
    Seol, Soobeen
    Park, Rae Woong
    Lee, Seunghwa
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 77 (01) : 66 - 76
  • [28] Prediction Models for Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Pan, Zhongmian
    Charoenkwan, Kittipat
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (18)
  • [29] Perioperative management of patients with a ventricular assist device undergoing non-cardiac surgery
    Falland, R.
    Allen, S. J.
    BJA EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (10) : 406 - 413
  • [30] Incidence, characteristics and risk factors for perioperative cardiac arrest and 30-day-mortality in preterm infants requiring non-cardiac surgery
    Jansen, Gerrit
    Irmscher, Linda
    May, Theodor W.
    Borgstedt, Rainer
    Popp, Jakob
    Scholz, Sean S.
    Rehberg, Sebastian W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 73