Clinical impact of a pharmacist-led medication review with follow up for aged polypharmacy patients: A cluster randomized controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Varas-Doval, Raquel [1 ]
Gastelurrutia, Miguel A. [2 ]
Benrimoj, Shalom I. [2 ]
Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria [3 ]
Saez-Benito, Loreto [4 ]
Martinez-Martinez, Fernando [2 ]
机构
[1] Spanish Gen Council Official Pharmacists Assoc, Pharmaceut Serv, Dept Innovat & Educ, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Fac Pharm, Pharmaceut Res Grp, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Discipline Pharm, Grad Sch Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] San Jorge Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA | 2020年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
Medication Therapy Management; Community Pharmacy Services; Pharmacies; Pharmacists; Polypharmacy; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spain; COMMUNITY; MANAGEMENT; SETTINGS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2133
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Medication review with follow-up (MRF) is a service where community pharmacists undertake a medication review with monthly follow-up to provide continuing care. The ConSIGUE Program assessed the impact and implementation of MRF for aged polypharmacy patients in Spanish Community Pharmacies. The present paper reports on the clinical impact evaluation phase of ConSIGUE. Objective: The main objective of the study was to measure the effect of MRF on the primary outcome of the number of uncontrolled health problems. Secondary objectives were to analyze the drug-related problems (DRPs) identified as potential causes of ineffective or unsafe medications and the pharmacists' interventions implemented during MRF provision. Methods: An open-label multi-centered cluster randomized study with comparison group (CG) was carried out in community pharmacies from 4 provinces in Spain during 6 months. The main inclusion criteria were patients over 64 years old, using 5 or more medicines. The intervention group (IG) received the MRF service (advanced medication review-type 3 MR) whereas patients in the CG received usual care. Results: 178 pharmacies recruited 1403 patients (IG= 688 patients; CG= 715 patients). During the 6 months of the study 72 patients were lost to follow up. The adjusted multi-level random effects models showed a significant reduction in the number of uncontrolled health problems over the periods in the IG (-0.72, 95% CI: -0.80, -0.65) and no change in the CG (-0.03, 95%Cl: -0.10, 0.04). Main DRPs identified as potential causes of failures of uncontrolled health problems' treatment were undertreated condition (559 DRPs; 35.81%), lack of treatment adherence (261 DRP; 16.67%) and risk of adverse effects (207 DRPs; 13.53%). Interventions performed by pharmacist to solve DRP mainly included the addition (246 interventions; 14.67%) and change (330 interventions; 19.68%) of a medicine and educational interventions on medicine adherence (231 interventions; 13.78%) and non-pharmacological interventions (369 interventions; 22.01%). Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the impact of community pharmacist on clinical outcomes for aged patients. It suggests that the provision of an MRF in collaboration with general medical practitioners and patients contributes to the improvement of aged polypharmacy patients' health status and reduces their problems related with the use of medicines.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Developing and evaluating complex interventions
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD POP AG 1950 20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Pharmacy Practice, V4, P44
[4]  
Aspinall Sherrie, 2007, Am J Geriatr Pharmacother, V5, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.03.009
[5]  
Benrimoj SI, 2010, ARS PHARM, V51, P69
[6]   Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, Marion K. ;
Piaggio, Gilda ;
Elbourne, Diana R. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
[7]  
Comite Internacional de Clasificacion de la WONCA, 1999, INT CLASS PRIM CAR 2
[8]   Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis [J].
Cosby, RH ;
Howard, M ;
Kaczorowski, J ;
Willan, AR ;
Sellors, JW .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 20 (01) :77-82
[9]  
ElDesoky Ehab S, 2007, Am J Ther, V14, P488, DOI 10.1097/01.mjt.0000183719.84390.4d
[10]  
Grupo de Expertos de Foro de Atencion Farmaceutica, 2008, GRUP EXP FOR AT FARM