Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol

被引:96
作者
Finch, Tracy L. [1 ]
Rapley, Tim [1 ]
Girling, Melissa [1 ]
Mair, Frances S. [2 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [3 ]
Treweek, Shaun [4 ]
McColl, Elaine [1 ]
Steen, Ian Nicholas [1 ]
May, Carl R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & WellBeing, Glasgow G12 9LX, Lanark, Scotland
[3] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Royal Free Hosp, London NW3 2PF, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[5] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2013年 / 8卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Normalization process theory; NPT; Implementation process; Survey; Instrument development; Complex interventions; IMPLEMENTATION; CARE; TECHNOLOGIES; DIFFUSION; DIFFICULT; INHIBIT; PROMOTE; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-8-43
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Understanding implementation processes is key to ensuring that complex interventions in healthcare are taken up in practice and thus maximize intended benefits for service provision and (ultimately) care to patients. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice. This study aims to develop and validate simple generic tools derived from NPT, to be used to improve the implementation of complex healthcare interventions. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to: develop a set of NPT-based measures and formatively evaluate their use for identifying implementation problems and monitoring progress; conduct preliminary evaluation of these measures across a range of interventions and contexts, and identify factors that affect this process; explore the utility of these measures for predicting outcomes; and develop an online users' manual for the measures. Methods: A combination of qualitative (workshops, item development, user feedback, cognitive interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods will be used to develop NPT measures, and test the utility of the measures in six healthcare intervention settings. Discussion: The measures developed in the study will be available for use by those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating complex interventions in healthcare and have the potential to enhance the chances of their implementation, leading to sustained changes in working practices.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, UNDERSTANDING IMPLEM
  • [3] [Anonymous], PRIM HLTH CARE RES D, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1463423609990168
  • [4] Provider experiences of the implementation of a new tuberculosis treatment programme: A qualitative study using the normalisation process model
    Atkins, Salla
    Lewin, Simon
    Ringsberg, Karin C.
    Thorson, Anna
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 11
  • [5] Understanding the management of early-stage chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study
    Blakeman, Tom
    Protheroe, Joanne
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn
    Rogers, Anne
    Kennedy, Anne
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (597) : e233 - e242
  • [6] Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
    Edwards, Philip James
    Roberts, Ian
    Clarke, Mike J.
    DiGuiseppi, Carolyn
    Wentz, Reinhard
    Kwan, Irene
    Cooper, Rachel
    Felix, Lambert M.
    Pratap, Sarah
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03):
  • [7] Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Legare, France
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Edwards, Adrian
    May, Carl
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (1)
  • [8] From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: Methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument
    Finch, Tracy L.
    Mair, Frances S.
    O'Donnell, Catherine
    Murray, Elizabeth
    May, Carl R.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [9] Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help?
    Forster, Della A.
    Newton, Michelle
    McLachlan, Helen L.
    Willis, Karen
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [10] The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices
    Foy, Robbie
    Ovretveit, John
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    Pronovost, Peter J.
    Taylor, Stephanie L.
    Dy, Sydney
    Hempel, Susanne
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Rubenstein, Lisa V.
    Wachter, Robert M.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (05) : 453 - 459