Distribution of crop wild relatives of conservation priority in the UK landscape

被引:26
|
作者
Jarvis, Susan [1 ]
Fielder, Hannah [2 ]
Hopkins, John [3 ]
Maxted, Nigel [2 ]
Smart, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Lancaster Environm Ctr, NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn TR10 9FE, Cornwall, England
关键词
Agriculture; Conservation; Crop wild relatives; Field margins; Landscape; Road verges; PLANT-SPECIES DIVERSITY; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.039
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Many crop species suffer from a lack of genetic diversity which reduces the ability of cultivars to withstand new pests or environmental stresses. The wild relatives of crop plants are an important source of genetic variation and can be used to introduce new traits into existing crops. Identification and conservation of crop wild relatives (CWR) is, therefore, an important step to safeguard future food security. Recent efforts have identified geographical hotspots of CWR diversity in several countries but, as yet, there have been no surveys to identity the habitats and landscape features within these areas that might be most suitable for conservation efforts. Here, we use a UK-wide vegetation survey covering a range of both habitats and landscape features (e.g. fields, hedgerows, waterways and roadsides) to identify the habitats and features with the highest proportion of CWR identified as priority taxa for conservation. Priority CWR were most abundant in grassland habitats, although this was most striking in CWR related to forage and fodder crops. CWR related to food crops were most common in cropped and weedy areas, fertile grassland and lowland woodland. Within habitats, CWR occurrence was significantly associated with linear features including hedgerows, roadsides, field boundaries and field margins. Our findings indicate that CWR of conservation interest are often associated with disturbed habitats and landscape features that are not considered as priorities under site-based conservation measures. We suggest that efforts to maintain linear features in hotspots of CWR diversity would be most effective at conserving the UK's CWR resource. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 451
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crop wild relatives in Lebanon: mapping the distribution of Poaceae and Fabaceae priority taxa for conservation planning
    Eliane Sayde
    Lorenzo Raggi
    Lamis Chalak
    Mariana Yazbek
    Valeria Negri
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2023, 70 : 2097 - 2113
  • [2] Crop wild relatives in Lebanon: mapping the distribution of Poaceae and Fabaceae priority taxa for conservation planning
    Sayde, Eliane
    Raggi, Lorenzo
    Chalak, Lamis
    Yazbek, Mariana
    Negri, Valeria
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2023, 70 (07) : 2097 - 2113
  • [3] Priority areas for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives in South Africa
    Holness, Stephen
    Hamer, Michelle
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Raimondo, Domitilla
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2019, 17 (02): : 115 - 127
  • [4] Crop wild relatives conservation
    Haener, Raphael
    Schierscher, Beate
    Kleijer, Geert
    Rometsch, Sibylla
    Holderegger, Rolf
    AGRARFORSCHUNG, 2009, 16 (06): : 204 - 209
  • [5] The impact of climate change on the future distribution of priority crop wild relatives in Indonesia and implications for conservation planning
    Rahman, Wiguna
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Maxted, Nigel
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2023, 73
  • [6] Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) Priority in Italy: Distribution, Ecology, In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation and Expected Actions
    Perrino, Enrico Vito
    Wagensommer, Robert Philipp
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [7] In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: A Strategy for Identifying Priority Genetic Reserve Sites
    Kell, S. P.
    Maxted, N.
    Frese, L.
    Iriondo, J. M.
    AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : 7 - 19
  • [8] In situ and ex situ conservation gap analyses of West African priority crop wild relatives
    M. U. Nduche
    J. Magos Brehm
    M. Parra-Quijano
    N. Maxted
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2023, 70 : 333 - 351
  • [9] Enhancing the Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives in England
    Fielder, Hannah
    Brotherton, Peter
    Hosking, Julian
    Hopkins, John J.
    Ford-Lloyd, Brian
    Maxted, Nigel
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [10] Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives
    Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez
    Colin K. Khoury
    Harold A. Achicanoy
    Vivian Bernau
    Hannes Dempewolf
    Ruth J. Eastwood
    Luigi Guarino
    Ruth H. Harker
    Andy Jarvis
    Nigel Maxted
    Jonas V. Müller
    Julian Ramirez-Villegas
    Chrystian C. Sosa
    Paul C. Struik
    Holly Vincent
    Jane Toll
    Nature Plants, 2 (4)