Rice-duck co-culture for reducing negative impacts of biogas slurry application in rice production systems

被引:32
作者
Yang, Haishui [1 ]
Yu, Degui [2 ]
Zhou, Jiajia [1 ]
Zhai, Silong [1 ]
Bian, Xinmin [1 ]
Weih, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Agr, 1 Weigang Rd, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Hort, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, POB 7043, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Nutrient loss; Ecological recycling agriculture; Fertilizer; Agroecosystem; Irrigated rice production; ECOLOGICAL RECYCLING AGRICULTURE; LEACHING LOSSES; NITROGEN LOSSES; SOUTHERN CHINA; YIELD; CULTIVATION; ECOSYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses are a potential limitation for the direct application of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizer in irrigated rice production systems. The hypothesis was tested that a rice-duck co-culture promotes the rice N and P use efficiencies, reducing the losses of these nutrient elements through run-offs and enabling the use of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers. A field split-plot experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis. Our results showed that the direct application of biogas slurry was harmful for rice production. Compared with rice monoculture under chemical fertilization, biogas slurry application reduced N and P accumulation in grains, P use efficiency, and grain yield by 3.6%, 7.8%, 12.7%, and 14.8%, respectively, but increased the total N and P concentrations in the surface water 1.4- and 2.7-fold, respectively, on average on the eleventh day after fertilization. However, rice-duck co-culture compensated for the negative effects of biogas slurry on rice production. Under the biogas slurry application and in line with our hypothesis, the rice-duck co-culture significantly increased N and P accumulation and use efficiencies, as well as grain yield to levels similar to those acquired with chemical fertilization treatments. Meanwhile, total N and P concentrations were significantly lower for rice-duck co-culture than those of rice monoculture under biogas slurry application. Our results suggest that rice-duck co-culture can maintain rice yield and reduce the risks of N and P loss to local environments when utilizing biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 150
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Bao S. D., 2000, SOIL AGR CHEM
[2]  
Bi YuYun Bi YuYun, 2009, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V25, P211
[3]   Contamination and risk assessment of heavy metals in soils irrigated with biogas slurry: a case study of Taihu basin [J].
Bian, Bo ;
Wu, Hai Suo ;
Zhou, Ling Jun .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2015, 187 (04) :1-15
[4]  
Chen C., 2013, China Biogas, V31, P25
[5]   Measurement and analysis of biogas fertilizer use efficiency, nutrient distribution and influencing factors of biogas residues and slurry on pig farms [J].
Fan Min ;
Zhu Hongguang ;
Ma Jieqiong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 7 (01) :60-69
[6]   Overexpression of a pH-sensitive nitrate transporter in rice increases crop yields [J].
Fan, Xiaorong ;
Tang, Zhong ;
Tan, Yawen ;
Zhang, Yong ;
Luo, Bingbing ;
Yang, Meng ;
Lian, Xingming ;
Shen, Qirong ;
Miller, Anthony John ;
Xu, Guohua .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (26) :7118-7123
[7]   Ecological recycling agriculture can reduce inorganic nitrogen losses - model results from three Finnish catchments [J].
Granlund, Kirsti ;
Rankinen, Katri ;
Etheridge, Randall ;
Seuri, Pentti ;
Lehtoranta, Jouni .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 133 :167-176
[8]   Ecological Recycling Agriculture to Reduce Nutrient Pollution to Baltic Sea [J].
Granstedt, Artur ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Seuri, Pentti ;
Thomsson, Olof .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2008, 26 (03) :279-307
[9]  
Hossain ST, 2005, ASIAN J AGRIC DEV, V2, P79
[10]  
Hu LL, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V177, P28, DOI [10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.023, 10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.005]