Effect frequencies, effect sizes and number of markers on prediction of quantitative traits in chickens

被引:11
作者
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R. [1 ]
Nejati-Javaremi, A. [1 ]
Pakdel, A. [1 ]
Moradi-Shahrbabak, M. [1 ]
Morota, G. [2 ]
Valente, B. D. [2 ,3 ]
Kranis, A. [4 ,5 ]
Rosa, G. J. M. [2 ,6 ]
Gianola, D. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Univ Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Anim Sci, Karaj 3158777871, Iran
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Anim Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Dairy Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Aviagen Ltd, Newbridge, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Vet Studies, Roslin Inst & Royal Dick, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI USA
关键词
Broiler chicken; genomic best linear unbiased prediction; genome-enabled prediction; marker density; marker effect sizes; minor allele frequency; predictive ability; GENOMIC RELATIONSHIP MATRICES; ACCURACY; SELECTION; SUBSETS; HERITABILITY; ABILITY; VALUES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12075
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective was to assess goodness of fit and predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers constructed based on minor allele frequency (MAF), effect sizes and varying marker density. Target traits were body weight (BW), ultrasound measurement of breast muscle (BM) and hen house egg production (HHP) in broiler chickens. We used a 600K Affymetrix platform with 1352 birds genotyped. The prediction method was genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with 354564 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used to derive a genomic relationship matrix (G). Predictive ability was assessed as the correlation between predicted genomic values and corrected phenotypes from a threefold cross-validation. Predictive ability was 0.27 +/- 0.002 for BW, 0.33 +/- 0.001 for BM and 0.20 +/- 0.002 for HHP. For the three traits studied, predictive ability decreased when SNPs with a higher MAF were used to construct G. Selection of the 20% SNPs with the largest absolute effect sizes induced a predictive ability equal to that from fitting all markers together. When density of markers increased from 5K to 20K, predictive ability enhanced slightly. These results provide evidence that designing a low-density chip using low-frequency markers with large effect sizes may be useful for commercial usage.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 133
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R., 2014, J ANIM BREED GENET
[2]   An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes [J].
Altshuler, David M. ;
Durbin, Richard M. ;
Abecasis, Goncalo R. ;
Bentley, David R. ;
Chakravarti, Aravinda ;
Clark, Andrew G. ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Eichler, Evan E. ;
Flicek, Paul ;
Gabriel, Stacey B. ;
Gibbs, Richard A. ;
Green, Eric D. ;
Hurles, Matthew E. ;
Knoppers, Bartha M. ;
Korbel, Jan O. ;
Lander, Eric S. ;
Lee, Charles ;
Lehrach, Hans ;
Mardis, Elaine R. ;
Marth, Gabor T. ;
McVean, Gil A. ;
Nickerson, Deborah A. ;
Schmidt, Jeanette P. ;
Sherry, Stephen T. ;
Wang, Jun ;
Wilson, Richard K. ;
Gibbs, Richard A. ;
Dinh, Huyen ;
Kovar, Christie ;
Lee, Sandra ;
Lewis, Lora ;
Muzny, Donna ;
Reid, Jeff ;
Wang, Min ;
Wang, Jun ;
Fang, Xiaodong ;
Guo, Xiaosen ;
Jian, Min ;
Jiang, Hui ;
Jin, Xin ;
Li, Guoqing ;
Li, Jingxiang ;
Li, Yingrui ;
Li, Zhuo ;
Liu, Xiao ;
Lu, Yao ;
Ma, Xuedi ;
Su, Zhe ;
Tai, Shuaishuai ;
Tang, Meifang .
NATURE, 2012, 491 (7422) :56-65
[3]   A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals [J].
Browning, Brian L. ;
Browning, Sharon R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 84 (02) :210-223
[4]   Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale [J].
Chen, C. Y. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Muir, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (09) :2673-2679
[5]   Prediction of Complex Human Traits Using the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor [J].
de los Campos, Gustavo ;
Vazquez, Ana I. ;
Fernando, Rohan ;
Klimentidis, Yann C. ;
Sorensen, Daniel .
PLOS GENETICS, 2013, 9 (07)
[6]   Effect of marker-data editing on the accuracy of genomic prediction [J].
Edriss, V. ;
Guldbrandtsen, B. ;
Lund, M. S. ;
Su, G. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2013, 130 (02) :128-135
[7]   Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information [J].
Forni, Selma ;
Aguilar, Ignacio ;
Misztal, Ignacy .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[8]   Priors in Whole-Genome Regression: The Bayesian Alphabet Returns [J].
Gianola, Daniel .
GENETICS, 2013, 194 (03) :573-596
[9]  
Harris B L., 2011, Interbull Bulletin, V44, P37
[10]   Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges [J].
Hayes, B. J. ;
Bowman, P. J. ;
Chamberlain, A. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (02) :433-443