Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators

被引:23
作者
Owsianiak, Mikolaj [1 ]
Brooks, Jennifer [1 ]
Renz, Michael [2 ]
Laurent, Alexis [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, Div Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Bldg 116B, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, CSIC, Inst Tecnol Quim, Ave Naranjos S-N, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2018年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
biowaste; climate tipping; global temperature change potential; hydrothermal carbonization; life cycle assessment; waste management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOMASS WASTE STREAMS; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; BIOCHAR; IMPACTS; NITROGEN; FLUXES; WET; ESTABLISHMENT;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12484
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We employed life cycle assessment to evaluate the use of hydrochars, prospective soil conditioners produced from biowaste using hydrothermal carbonization, as an approach to improving agriculture while using carbon present in the biowaste. We considered six different crops (barley, wheat, sugar beet, fava bean, onion, and lucerne) and two different countries (Spain and Germany), and used three different indicators of climate change: global warming potential (GWP), global temperature change potential (GTP), and climate tipping potential (CTP). We found that although climate change benefits (GWP) from just sequestration and temporary storage of carbon are sufficient to outweigh impacts stemming from hydrochar production and transportation to the field, even greater benefits stem from replacing climate-inefficient biowaste management treatment options, like composting in Spain. By contrast, hydrochar addition to soil is not a good approach to improving agriculture in countries where incineration with energy recovery is the dominant treatment option for biowaste, like in Germany. Relatively small, but statistically significant differences in impact scores (ISs) were found between crops. Although these conclusions remained the same in our study, potential benefits from replacing composting were smaller in the GTP approach, which due to its long-term perspective gives less weight to short-lived greenhouse gases (GHGs) like methane. Using CTP as indicator, we also found that there is a risk of contributing to crossing of a short-term climatic target, the tipping point corresponding to an atmospheric GHG concentration of 450ppm CO2 equivalents, unless hydrochar stability in the soil is optimized. Our results highlight the need for considering complementary perspectives that different climate change indicators offer, and overall provide a foundation for assessing climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars used in agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 245
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Compounding food and income insecurity in Yemen: Challenges from climate change [J].
Wiebelt, Manfred ;
Breisinger, Clemens ;
Ecker, Olivier ;
Al-Riffai, Perrihan ;
Robertson, Richard ;
Thiele, Rainer .
FOOD POLICY, 2013, 43 :77-89
[32]   Indirect Effects Negate Global Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Substituting Gasoline With Corn Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel in the USA [J].
Brandao, Miguel .
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
[33]   Bioenergy crop productivity and potential climate change mitigation from marginal lands in the United States: An ecosystem modeling perspective [J].
Qin, Zhangcai ;
Zhuang, Qianlai ;
Cai, Ximing .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (06) :1211-1221
[34]   Evaluating Health Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation in Urban Mobility [J].
Wolkinger, Brigitte ;
Haas, Willi ;
Bachner, Gabriel ;
Weisz, Ulli ;
Steininger, Karl W. ;
Hutter, Hans-Peter ;
Delcour, Jennifer ;
Griebler, Robert ;
Mittelbach, Bernhard ;
Maier, Philipp ;
Reifeltshammer, Raphael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (05)
[35]   Future Regional Contributions for Climate Change Mitigation: Insights from Energy Investment Gap and Policy Cost [J].
Sun, Hongjie ;
Niu, Shuwen ;
Wang, Xiqiang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (12)
[36]   Value and impact of publicly funded climate change agricultural mitigation research: Insights from New Zealand [J].
Fleming-Munoz, David A. ;
Preston, Kate ;
Arratia-Solar, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 248
[37]   Climate change mitigation and productivity gains in livestock supply chains: insights from regional case studies [J].
Mottet, Anne ;
Henderson, Benjamin ;
Opio, Carolyn ;
Falcucci, Alessandra ;
Tempio, Giuseppe ;
Silvestri, Silvia ;
Chesterman, Sabrina ;
Gerber, Pierre J. .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2017, 17 (01) :129-141
[38]   'Climate Healing Stones': Common Minerals Offer Substantial Climate Change Mitigation Potential [J].
Pratt, Chris ;
Mahdi, Zainab ;
El Hanandeh, Ali .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (06) :1167-1179
[39]   Climate change mitigation potential of community-based initiatives in Europe [J].
David M. Landholm ;
Anne Holsten ;
Federico Martellozzo ;
Dominik E. Reusser ;
Jürgen P. Kropp .
Regional Environmental Change, 2019, 19 :927-938
[40]   Climate change mitigation potential in sanitation via off-site composting of human waste [J].
McNicol, Gavin ;
Jeliazovski, Julie ;
Francois, Junior Jules ;
Kramer, Sasha ;
Ryals, Rebecca .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (06) :545-+