Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators

被引:21
|
作者
Owsianiak, Mikolaj [1 ]
Brooks, Jennifer [1 ]
Renz, Michael [2 ]
Laurent, Alexis [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, Div Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Bldg 116B, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, CSIC, Inst Tecnol Quim, Ave Naranjos S-N, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2018年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
biowaste; climate tipping; global temperature change potential; hydrothermal carbonization; life cycle assessment; waste management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOMASS WASTE STREAMS; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; BIOCHAR; IMPACTS; NITROGEN; FLUXES; WET; ESTABLISHMENT;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12484
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We employed life cycle assessment to evaluate the use of hydrochars, prospective soil conditioners produced from biowaste using hydrothermal carbonization, as an approach to improving agriculture while using carbon present in the biowaste. We considered six different crops (barley, wheat, sugar beet, fava bean, onion, and lucerne) and two different countries (Spain and Germany), and used three different indicators of climate change: global warming potential (GWP), global temperature change potential (GTP), and climate tipping potential (CTP). We found that although climate change benefits (GWP) from just sequestration and temporary storage of carbon are sufficient to outweigh impacts stemming from hydrochar production and transportation to the field, even greater benefits stem from replacing climate-inefficient biowaste management treatment options, like composting in Spain. By contrast, hydrochar addition to soil is not a good approach to improving agriculture in countries where incineration with energy recovery is the dominant treatment option for biowaste, like in Germany. Relatively small, but statistically significant differences in impact scores (ISs) were found between crops. Although these conclusions remained the same in our study, potential benefits from replacing composting were smaller in the GTP approach, which due to its long-term perspective gives less weight to short-lived greenhouse gases (GHGs) like methane. Using CTP as indicator, we also found that there is a risk of contributing to crossing of a short-term climatic target, the tipping point corresponding to an atmospheric GHG concentration of 450ppm CO2 equivalents, unless hydrochar stability in the soil is optimized. Our results highlight the need for considering complementary perspectives that different climate change indicators offer, and overall provide a foundation for assessing climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars used in agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 245
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Potential of Climate Change Mitigation Actions in Three Different City Types in Finland
    Kyro, Riikka
    Heinonen, Jukka
    Saynajoki, Antti
    Junnila, Seppo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (07) : 1510 - 1524
  • [2] Evaluating the potential contribution of urban ecosystem service to climate change mitigation
    Parsa, Vahid Amini
    Salehi, Esmail
    Yavari, Ahmad Reza
    van Bodegom, Peter M.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 22 (05) : 989 - 1006
  • [3] Evaluating the potential contribution of urban ecosystem service to climate change mitigation
    Vahid Amini Parsa
    Esmail Salehi
    Ahmad Reza Yavari
    Peter M. van Bodegom
    Urban Ecosystems, 2019, 22 : 989 - 1006
  • [4] Cover crops support the climate change mitigation potential of agroecosystems
    Schoen, Jonas
    Gentsch, Norman
    Breunig, Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [5] Pyrolysis of invasive woody vegetation for energy and biochar has climate change mitigation potential
    Simmons, Aaron T.
    Cowie, Annette L.
    Waters, Cathy M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
  • [6] Tackling climate change at the city level: insights from Lighthouse Cities' climate mitigation efforts
    Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe
    Savas, Zehra Funda
    Demir, Muhittin Hakan
    Kentmen-Cin, Cigdem
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [7] Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Wind Energy
    Barthelmie, Rebecca J.
    Pryor, Sara C.
    CLIMATE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [8] Assessing the climate change mitigation potential from food waste composting
    Perez, Tibisay
    Vergara, Sintana E.
    Silver, Whendee L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Climate change mitigation as a co-benefit of regenerative ranching: insights from Australia and the United States
    Gosnell, Hannah
    Charnley, Susan
    Stanley, Paige
    INTERFACE FOCUS, 2020, 10 (05)
  • [10] Perceived indicators of climate change in Tanzania: insights from the university of Dodoma students
    Mramba, Rosemary Peter
    Mapunda, Pensia Elias
    BMC ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 24 (01):