The SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 health surveys in New Zealand: norms, scoring coefficients and cross-country comparisons

被引:55
作者
Frieling, Margreet A. [1 ]
Davis, Walter R. [2 ]
Chiang, Grace [1 ]
机构
[1] Stat New Zealand, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
[2] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Stat & Survey Methodol, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
self-reported health; SF-36; SF-12; population norms; scoring coefficients; New Zealand; STATUS QUESTIONNAIRES; VALIDITY; QUALITY; SCORES; SCALES;
D O I
10.1111/1753-6405.12006
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To provide New Zealand population norms for version 2 of the SF-36 and SF-12 health surveys and report scoring coefficients that enable the construction of Physical and Mental Component Summary scores from New Zealand SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 data. Approach: Norms for the SF-36v2 and scoring coefficients for the Physical and Mental Component Summary scores are estimated using 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey data, which included 12,488 adults (aged 15 years and over). Norms for the SF-12v2 are derived from 2008 New Zealand General Social Survey data, including 8,721 adults. Comparisons are made between New Zealand norms for versions 1 and 2 of the SF-36 instrument. In addition, New Zealand SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 norms and the scoring coefficients are compared with those for the United States and South Australia. Conclusion: Differences between: 1) New Zealand population norms for the SF-36 versions 1 and 2; and 2) SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 population norms for New Zealand and those for the United States and South Australia highlight the importance of using version-specific and country-specific population norms. Implications: The analysis reported here allows for the appropriate use of the SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 instruments in New Zealand.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]  
[Anonymous], PORTR HLTH KEY RES 2
[3]   Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality:: The IQOLA project approach [J].
Bullinger, M ;
Alonso, J ;
Apolone, G ;
Leplège, A ;
Sullivan, M ;
Wood-Dauphinee, S ;
Gandek, B ;
Wagner, A ;
Aaronson, N ;
Bech, P ;
Fukuhara, S ;
Kaasa, S ;
Ware, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :913-923
[4]  
Cannell C.F., 1981, P SOCIAL STAT SECTIO, P1
[5]  
De Leeuw ED, 2008, INT HDB SURV METHODO
[6]  
de Vet HCW, 2005, QUAL LIFE RES, V14, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s11136-004-5742-3
[7]  
Groves R. M., 2009, SURVEY METHODOLOGY
[8]   The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores [J].
Hann, Mark ;
Reeves, David .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (03) :413-423
[9]  
Haslett S., 1999, 1996 97 NZ HLTH SURV
[10]   The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms [J].
Hawthorne, Graeme ;
Osborne, Richard H. ;
Taylor, Anne ;
Sansoni, Jan .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (04) :661-673