Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography

被引:29
|
作者
Reid, T. D. [1 ]
Chan, D. S. Y. [1 ]
Roberts, S. A. [2 ]
Crosby, T. D. L. [3 ]
Williams, G. T. [4 ]
Lewis, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Pathol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
oesophageal cancer; oesophagectomy; circumferential resection margin; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.511
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimum multimodal treatment for oesophageal cancer, and the prognostic significance of histopathological tumour involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM+) are uncertain. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of CRM+ after oesophagectomy and to identify endosonographic (endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS)) features that predict a threatened CRM+. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent potentially curative oesophagectomy (103 surgery alone, 124 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CS) and 42 chemoradiotherapy (CRTS)). Primary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: CRM+ was reported in 98 (38.0%) of all, and in 90 (62.5%) of pT3 patients. Multivariate analysis of pathological factors revealed: lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.087, 95% CI 1.396-3.122, P<0.0001), CRM+ (HR 1.762, 95% CI 1.201-2.586, P=0.004) and lymph node metastasis count (HR 1.563, 95% CI 1.018-2.400, P=0.041) to be independently and significantly associated with DFS. Lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.160, 95% CI 1.432-3.259, P<0.001) and CRM+ (HR 1.514, 95% CI 1.000-2.292, P=0.050) were also independently and significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed EUS T stage (T3 or T4, OR 24.313, 95% CI 7.438-79.476, P<0.0001) and use or not of CRTS (OR 0.116, 95% CI 0.035-0.382, P<0.0001) were independently and significantly associated with CRM+. CONCLUSION: A positive CRM was a better predictor of DFS and OS than standard pTNM stage. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1925-1931. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.511 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 November 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lack of Independent Significance of a Close (<1 mm) Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Esophageal and Junctional Cancer
    N. J. O’Farrell
    C. L. Donohoe
    C. Muldoon
    J. M. Costelloe
    S. King
    N. Ravi
    J. V. Reynolds
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 2727 - 2733
  • [32] Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin After Curative Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Galvez, Ana
    Biondo, Sebastiano
    Trenti, Loris
    Espin, Eloy
    Kraft, Miquel
    Farres, Ramon
    Codina-Cazador, Antonio
    Flor, Blas
    Garcia-Granero, Eduardo
    Enriquez-Navascues, Jose M.
    Borda-Arrizabalaga, Nerea
    Kreisler, Esther
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2023, 66 (07) : 887 - 897
  • [33] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Patel, A.
    Green, N.
    Sarmah, P.
    Langman, G.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Youssef, H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [34] Prognostic significance of a positive radial margin after esophageal cancer resection
    Gilbert, Sebastien
    Martel, Andre B.
    Seely, Andrew J.
    Maziak, Donna E.
    Shamji, Farid M.
    Sundaresan, Sudhir R.
    Villeneuve, P. James
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 149 (02) : 548 - 555
  • [35] Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: A retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database
    Al-Sukhni, Eisar
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Gabriel, Emmanuel
    Nurkin, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 28 : 112 - 117
  • [36] The prognostic value of combining the CD8+lymphocyte density and the circulating lymphocyte ratio in circumferential resection margin biopsy in rectal cancer
    Wu, Bo
    Zhao, Shengchao
    Sheng, Yaru
    Ren, Lu
    Song, Guoquan
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (34)
  • [37] Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment
    Ghadban, Tarik
    Reeh, Matthias
    Koenig, Alexandra M.
    Nentwich, Michael F.
    Bellon, Eugen
    Izbicki, Jakob R.
    Vashist, Yogesh K.
    Kutup, Asad
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (06) : 988 - 994
  • [38] Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement after long-term preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer
    P. Luna
    A. Maffuz
    S. Rodriguez
    M. Gutierrez de la Barrera
    I. Alvarado
    E. Bustos
    S. Labastida
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : S111 - S111
  • [39] Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement after long-term preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer
    Luna, P
    Maffuz, A
    Rodriguez, S
    de la Barrera, MG
    Alvarado, I
    Bustos, E
    Labastida, S
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : S111 - S111
  • [40] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36