Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography

被引:29
|
作者
Reid, T. D. [1 ]
Chan, D. S. Y. [1 ]
Roberts, S. A. [2 ]
Crosby, T. D. L. [3 ]
Williams, G. T. [4 ]
Lewis, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Pathol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
oesophageal cancer; oesophagectomy; circumferential resection margin; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.511
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimum multimodal treatment for oesophageal cancer, and the prognostic significance of histopathological tumour involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM+) are uncertain. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of CRM+ after oesophagectomy and to identify endosonographic (endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS)) features that predict a threatened CRM+. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent potentially curative oesophagectomy (103 surgery alone, 124 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CS) and 42 chemoradiotherapy (CRTS)). Primary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: CRM+ was reported in 98 (38.0%) of all, and in 90 (62.5%) of pT3 patients. Multivariate analysis of pathological factors revealed: lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.087, 95% CI 1.396-3.122, P<0.0001), CRM+ (HR 1.762, 95% CI 1.201-2.586, P=0.004) and lymph node metastasis count (HR 1.563, 95% CI 1.018-2.400, P=0.041) to be independently and significantly associated with DFS. Lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.160, 95% CI 1.432-3.259, P<0.001) and CRM+ (HR 1.514, 95% CI 1.000-2.292, P=0.050) were also independently and significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed EUS T stage (T3 or T4, OR 24.313, 95% CI 7.438-79.476, P<0.0001) and use or not of CRTS (OR 0.116, 95% CI 0.035-0.382, P<0.0001) were independently and significantly associated with CRM+. CONCLUSION: A positive CRM was a better predictor of DFS and OS than standard pTNM stage. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1925-1931. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.511 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 November 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection
    Luna-Pérez, P
    Bustos-Cholico, E
    Alvarado, I
    Maffuz, A
    Rodríguez-Ramírez, S
    De La Barrera, MG
    Labastida, S
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 90 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [22] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN STATUS IN OESOPHAGEAL CANCER-A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Rotimi, O.
    Greenwood, D.
    Tu, Y-K
    GUT, 2012, 61 : A306 - A306
  • [23] A Circumferential Resection Margin of 1 mm Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Patients With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Park, Jong Seob
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 933 - 940
  • [24] Prognostic Significance of Circumferential Resection Margin Following Total Mesorectal Excision and Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Seung Hyuk Baik
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Young Chan Lee
    Hoguen Kim
    Kang Young Lee
    Seung Kook Sohn
    Chang Hwan Cho
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14 : 462 - 469
  • [25] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Lee, Young Chan
    Kim, Hoguen
    Lee, Kang Young
    Sohn, Seung Kook
    Cho, Chang Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 462 - 469
  • [26] Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hwang, Mi Ri
    Park, Ji Won
    Park, Sohee
    Yoon, Hyekyoung
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Sun Young
    Park, Sung Chan
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 1345 - 1351
  • [27] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study
    Liu, Qi
    Luo, Dakui
    Cai, Sanjun
    Li, Qingguo
    Li, Xinxiang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (08): : 3673 - 3681
  • [28] Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Depypere, L.
    Moons, J.
    Lerut, T.
    De Hertogh, G.
    Peters, C.
    Sagaert, X.
    Coosemans, W.
    Van Veer, H.
    Nafteux, P.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2018, 31 (02) : 1 - 8
  • [29] Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery
    Kelly, S. B.
    Mills, S. J.
    Bradburn, D. M.
    Ratcliffe, A. A.
    Borowski, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 573 - 581
  • [30] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer
    Chan, D. S. Y.
    Reid, T. D.
    Howell, I.
    Lewis, W. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (04) : 456 - 464