Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography

被引:29
|
作者
Reid, T. D. [1 ]
Chan, D. S. Y. [1 ]
Roberts, S. A. [2 ]
Crosby, T. D. L. [3 ]
Williams, G. T. [4 ]
Lewis, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Pathol, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
oesophageal cancer; oesophagectomy; circumferential resection margin; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.511
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimum multimodal treatment for oesophageal cancer, and the prognostic significance of histopathological tumour involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM+) are uncertain. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of CRM+ after oesophagectomy and to identify endosonographic (endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS)) features that predict a threatened CRM+. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent potentially curative oesophagectomy (103 surgery alone, 124 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CS) and 42 chemoradiotherapy (CRTS)). Primary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: CRM+ was reported in 98 (38.0%) of all, and in 90 (62.5%) of pT3 patients. Multivariate analysis of pathological factors revealed: lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.087, 95% CI 1.396-3.122, P<0.0001), CRM+ (HR 1.762, 95% CI 1.201-2.586, P=0.004) and lymph node metastasis count (HR 1.563, 95% CI 1.018-2.400, P=0.041) to be independently and significantly associated with DFS. Lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.160, 95% CI 1.432-3.259, P<0.001) and CRM+ (HR 1.514, 95% CI 1.000-2.292, P=0.050) were also independently and significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed EUS T stage (T3 or T4, OR 24.313, 95% CI 7.438-79.476, P<0.0001) and use or not of CRTS (OR 0.116, 95% CI 0.035-0.382, P<0.0001) were independently and significantly associated with CRM+. CONCLUSION: A positive CRM was a better predictor of DFS and OS than standard pTNM stage. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1925-1931. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.511 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 November 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography
    T D Reid
    D S Y Chan
    S A Roberts
    T D L Crosby
    G T Williams
    W G Lewis
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 107 : 1925 - 1931
  • [2] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer
    Khan, OA
    Fitzgerald, JJ
    Soomro, I
    Beggs, FD
    Morgan, WE
    Duffy, JP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (10) : 1549 - 1552
  • [3] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer
    O A Khan
    J J Fitzgerald
    I Soomro
    F D Beggs
    W E Morgan
    J P Duffy
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 88 : 1549 - 1552
  • [4] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer
    Quinn, Lauren M.
    Hollis, Alexander C.
    Hodson, James
    Elshafie, Mona A.
    Hallissey, Mike T.
    Whiting, John L.
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (08): : 1268 - 1277
  • [5] Prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Liu, C-Y
    Hsu, P-K
    Hsu, H-S
    Wu, Y-C
    Chuang, C-Y
    Lin, C-H
    Hsu, C-P
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (09)
  • [6] Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer
    Wang, Cun
    Zhou, Zong-guang
    Yu, Yong-yang
    Shu, Ye
    Li, Yuan
    Yang, Lie
    Li, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (04) : 385 - 390
  • [7] Prognostic significance of cancer within 1 mm of the circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
    Salih, Tamir
    Jose, Paul
    Mehta, Samir P.
    Mirza, Ahmed
    Udall, Gavin
    Pritchard, Susan A.
    Hayden, Jeremy D.
    Grabsch, Heike I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (03) : 562 - 567
  • [8] Prognostic Significance of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jie
    Chen, Qi-Xun
    Teng, Li-song
    Krasna, Mark J.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (02) : 446 - 453
  • [9] The Circumferential Resection Margin Is a Prognostic Predictor in Colon Cancer
    Tang, Xin-Yi
    Huang, Meng-Xi
    Han, Si-Qi
    Chang, Yue
    Li, Zhi-Ping
    Kao, Xiao-Ming
    Chen, Yan-Yan
    Liu, Chao
    Huang, Ya-Di
    Chen, Yi-Tian
    Lei, Zeng-Jie
    Chu, Xiao-Yuan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [10] The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer
    Shin, Dong Woo
    Shin, Jin Yong
    Oh, Sung Jin
    Park, Jong Kwon
    Yu, Hyeon
    Ahn, Min Sung
    Bae, Ki Beom
    Hong, Kwan Hee
    Ji, Yong Il
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (04) : 348 - 355