Nursing knowledge and human science revisited: Practical and political considerations

被引:20
作者
Cody, WK
Mitchell, GJ
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
human science; lived experience; meaning; Newman; nursing knowledge; paradigms; Parse; Watson;
D O I
10.1177/08943180222108705
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The human science tradition is rooted in human freedom and meaning and oriented toward narrative and dialogical methods. In the past 10 years, human science nursing has grown but the opposition has also increased. Whereas other health disciplines are turning to the study of lived experience, nursing on the whole may be turning away. This article updates progress in human science, including works related to major nursing theories. The authors address practical and political considerations related to language, community, theory-laden knowledge, and tolerance for diversity. The authors conclude that the suppression of human science imperils nursing as a practice of being-with, witnessing, and cocreating quality of life, lived by nurses. But theories live in the actions of those who support them; thus, any place where people seek human care has the potential to support a human science-based nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, INTERPRETIVE TURN PH
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM CONTINENTAL PHILO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SCI UNFETTERED PHILO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Humanistic Nursing
[5]  
[Anonymous], PORTRAITS AM CONTINE
[6]  
[Anonymous], NEW IDOLS CAVE
[7]  
[Anonymous], HOUSE BUILT SAND
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Introduction to the human sciences
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, TRUTH METHOD
[10]  
Bambach Charles., 1995, HEIDEGGER DILTHEY CR