Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse in Sugarcane Biorefinery: A Techno-economic and Environmental Analysis

被引:53
作者
Longati, Andreza A. [1 ]
Lino, Anderson R. A. [1 ]
Giordano, Roberto C. [1 ,2 ]
Furlan, Felipe F. [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Antonio J. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Carlos PPGEQ UFSCar, Chem Engn Grad Program, CP 676, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sao Carlos DEQ UFSCar, Dept Chem Engn, CP 676, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Biorefinery; Techno-economic-environmental evaluation; Bioethanol; Biogas from vinasse; Anaerobic biodigestion; Modelling and simulation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; ENERGY; BAGASSE; STILLAGE; BRAZIL; FERMENTATION; OPTIMIZATION; PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-019-00811-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of effluents in sugarcane biorefineries may improve the energy balance in the bioethanol production process and the environmental suitability of wastes disposal. This study analyses the inclusion of AD of vinasse (stillage) into different configurations of sugarcane biorefineries, using technical, economic and environmental metrics. The three base-case scenarios are a first generation (1G) ethanol plant, an integrated first and second generation (1G2G) ethanol plant with alcoholic fermentation of the hemicellulose fraction (C5), and an 1G2G ethanol plant with biodigestion of the C5 fraction. These three base scenarios are compared with the similar ones including the biodigestion of vinasse. The implementation of vinasse biodigestion had positive impact on the productivity and sustainability of sugarcane biorefineries. The use of biogas from vinasse for a 1G ethanol plant increased in 9.20% the surplus of electric energy yielded to the grid. This scenario had a positive net present value, NPV: + 11.5 x 10(6)USD, assuming minimum acceptable rate of return, MARR = 11%. For the 1G2G + C5 fermentation scenario the NPV was + 4.63 x 10(6)USD. Assuming NPV = 0, the IRR for 1G becomes 19.7% and for 1G2G + C5, 13.6%, an IRR higher than the MARR. The inclusion of AD of vinasse when the C5 fraction is biodigested was not an economically feasible option. In all scenarios, vinasse biodigestion reduced environmental impacts, and the 1G2G processes exhibit better results than the consolidated 1G for almost all environmental impact categories. The AD of vinasse can be considered an environmental-friendly and economical-feasible technology to improve the process in sugarcane biorefineries. Graphic
引用
收藏
页码:4573 / 4591
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse for biogas production and digestate valorization [J].
Agarwal, Nitin Kumar ;
Kumar, Madan ;
Ghosh, Pooja ;
Kumar, Smita S. ;
Singh, Lakhveer ;
Vijay, Virendra Kumar ;
Kumar, Vivek .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 295
[42]   Synergetic anaerobic digestion of food waste for enhanced production of biogas and value-added products: strategies, challenges, and techno-economic analysis [J].
Sharma, Pooja ;
Parakh, Sheetal Kishor ;
Tsui, To Hung ;
Bano, Ambreen ;
Singh, Surendra Pratap ;
Singh, Vijay Pratap ;
Lam, Su Shiung ;
Nadda, Ashok Kumar ;
Tong, Yen Wah .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 44 (06) :1040-1060
[43]   Production of phosphate biofertilizers as a booster for the techno-economic and environmental performance of a first-generation sugarcane ethanol and sugar biorefinery [J].
Elias, Andrew M. ;
Gargalo, Carina L. ;
Farinas, Cristiane S. ;
V. Gernaey, Krist .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 471
[44]   Environmental and techno-economic evaluation of β-carotene production from Dunaliella salina. A biorefinery approach [J].
Espada, Juan J. ;
Perez-Antolin, Daniel ;
Vicente, Gemma ;
Bautista, Luis F. ;
Morales, Victoria ;
Rodriguez, Rosalie .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2020, 14 (01) :43-54
[45]   Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies [J].
Lombardi, Lidia ;
Francini, Giovanni .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 156 :440-458
[46]   Integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis of guayule rubber production [J].
Sproul, Evan ;
Summers, Hailey M. ;
Seavert, Clark ;
Robbs, Joram ;
Khanal, Sita ;
Mealing, VeeAnder ;
Landis, Amy E. ;
Fan, Neng ;
Sun, Ou ;
Quinn, Jason C. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
[47]   Environmental and economic analysis of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses and agave juice [J].
Parascanu, Maria Magdalena ;
Sanchez, Nestor ;
Sandoval-Salas, Fabiola ;
Mendez Carreto, Carlos ;
Soreanu, Gabriela ;
Sanchez-Silva, Luz .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (45) :64374-64393
[48]   Uncovering the Techno-Economic and Environmental Implications of a Multiproduct Biorefinery from Exhausted Olive Pomace [J].
Perez-Almada, Deborah ;
Galan-Martin, Angel ;
del Mar Contreras, Maria ;
Miguel Romero-Garcia, Juan ;
Castro, Eulogio .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (07) :2732-2745
[49]   Techno-economic analysis of pretreatments to dairy manure biomass for enhanced biogas production [J].
Kim, Joonrae Roger ;
Hu, Yicheng ;
Zavala, Victor M. ;
Karthikeyan, K. G. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 20
[50]   Kinetic model discrimination on the biogas production in thermophilic co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and water hyacinth [J].
Chai, Audrey ;
Wong, Yee-Shian ;
Ong, Soon-An ;
Lutpi, Nabilah Aminah ;
Sam, Sung-Ting ;
Kee, Wei-Chin ;
Eng, Kim-Mun .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (40) :61298-61306