The decision partner in healthcare decision-making: A concept analysis

被引:34
作者
Gray, Tamryn F. [1 ]
Nolan, Marie T. [2 ,3 ]
Clayman, Marla L. [4 ]
Wenzel, Jennifer A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Amer Inst Res, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Decision-making; Dyad; Partner; Interpersonal; Decision partner; Decision control preference; Family; Relationality; FAMILY INVOLVEMENT; CANCER COMMUNICATION; RELATIONAL AUTONOMY; PATIENT PREFERENCES; SUPPORT NETWORKS; MENTAL-HEALTH; CAREGIVER; PARTICIPATION; LIFE; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The decision partner concept emerged to describe someone who contributes to healthcare decision-making with a patient. There is a need for greater precision and consensus surrounding its conceptual definition and use in broader populations. Objective: To define and describe the decision partner concept within the context of healthcare decision making. Design: A concept analysis. Data sources: We searched the following databases for articles published between 1990-2017: PsychINFO, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. We included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods studies that used the term decision partner in the context of healthcare decision-making. Methods: We applied the Walker and Avant method to identify the antecedents, attributes, related concepts, consequences, and empirical referents of the concept, with major themes identified. Results: From the 112 articles included in this concept analysis, 6 defining attributes of decision partner were identified: (1) has a relationship with the patient, (2) demonstrates a willingness to participate in decision-making, (3) articulates a clear understanding of both the patient's health condition and the decisions that must be made, (4) demonstrates decision-making self-efficacy; (5) exemplifies an emotional capacity to participate in decision-making, and (6) willing to fulfill several supportive roles including patient advocate and the "hub of information". Conclusions: A unifying definition and discussion of the decision partner concept has been developed. Our findings: (1) offer insights into refining the concept across various diseases and healthcare encounters, (2) contribute to developing theoretical models and empirical research to refine antecedents, attributes, consequences, (3) serve as a foundation to develop instruments to measure the concept and (4) highlight the need to design interventions that include and support decision partners in healthcare decision making. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   Trusting Others: The Polarization Effect of Need for Closure [J].
Acar-Burkay, Sinem ;
Fennis, Bob M. ;
Warlop, Luk .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 107 (04) :719-735
[2]  
Andrades Marie, 2013, J Family Med Prim Care, V2, P283, DOI 10.4103/2249-4863.120767
[3]  
[Anonymous], J EVAL CLIN PRACT
[4]  
[Anonymous], U CHICAGO LEGAL FORU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[6]  
[Anonymous], NURS OUTLOOK
[7]  
[Anonymous], DEF PARTN
[8]  
[Anonymous], ETHICS MENTAL HLTH R
[9]  
[Anonymous], CRIT CARE MED
[10]   Centering families in cancer communication research: acknowledging the impact of support, culture and process on client/provider communication in cancer management [J].
Ballard-Reisch, DS ;
Letner, JA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (01) :61-66