Impact of Environmental Regulations on Export Trade-Empirical Analysis Based on Zhejiang Province

被引:11
作者
Huang, Juan [1 ]
Wu, Ziyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Sch Slavon & East European Studies, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
environmental regulations; export trade; extended gravity model; green economy;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph191912569
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a close connection between export trade and environmental regulations. How to realize the green development of export trade under the constraint of environmental regulation policy is a controversial topic in both theoretical research and practice. Considering the leading role of Zhejiang export trade in China, based on the extended gravity model, this paper attempts to explore the impact of environmental regulations on export trade using the panel data of Zhejiang Province together with that of 18 major "Belt and Road" trading countries (regions) from 2004 to 2016. It provides a theoretical basis for promoting the coordinated development of environmental protection and export trade. This not only has theoretical and practical significance for various regions in China but also for other countries and regions in the world when formulating environmental regulation standards and implementation intensity. The empirical results show that there is a U-shaped relationship between environmental regulations and the development of export trade; namely, the former suppresses the latter before promotion happens. Specifically, environmental regulation could increase the cost of export products and curb the development of export trade in the short term. On the other hand, it encourages enterprises to carry out technological innovation and improve efficiency and competitiveness, thus contributing to the development of export trade in the long term.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[2]   Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Caporale, Guglielmo Maria ;
Rault, Christophe ;
Sova, Robert ;
Sova, Anamaria .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 81 :130-139
[3]  
Barin S., 2022, ENG SCI TECHNOL INT, V34, P101174, DOI [10.3390/biophysica2030025, 10.1016/j.jestch.2022.101174]
[4]  
Cherniwchan J.M., 2022, 30020 NAT BUR EC RES
[5]   Do Environmental Regulations Affect the Decision to Export [J].
Cherniwchan, Jevan ;
Najjar, Nouri .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 14 (02) :125-160
[6]  
Dean J., 2008, CAN J ECON, V5, P48
[7]   Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test [J].
Dean, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2002, 35 (04) :819-842
[8]   Does Foreign Environmental Policy Influence Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the Wind Industry [J].
Dechezlepretre, Antoine ;
Glachant, Matthieu .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (03) :391-413
[9]   环境规制对企业产品创新的非线性影响 [J].
杜威剑 ;
李梦洁 .
科学学研究, 2016, 34 (03) :462-470
[10]   Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality [J].
Frankel, JA ;
Rose, AK .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2005, 87 (01) :85-91