共 50 条
Outcomes in Patients With Cirrhosis on Primary Compared to Secondary Prophylaxis for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
被引:21
|作者:
Bajaj, Jasmohan S.
[1
,2
]
Tandon, Puneeta
[3
]
O'Leary, Jacqueline G.
[4
,5
]
Wong, Florence
[6
]
Biggins, Scott W.
[7
,8
]
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
[9
]
Kamath, Patrick S.
[10
]
Maliakkal, Benedict
[11
,12
]
Fallon, Michael B.
[13
,14
]
Lai, Jennifer C.
[15
]
Thuluvath, Paul J.
[16
]
Vargas, Hugo E.
[17
]
Subramanian, Ram M.
[18
]
Thacker, Leroy R.
[1
,2
]
Reddy, K. Rajender
[19
]
机构:
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] McGuire VA Med Ctr, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Dallas VA Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Univ Denver, Denver, CO USA
[9] Yale Univ, Med Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Univ Tennessee, Memphis, TN USA
[12] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[13] Univ Arizona, Phoenix, AZ USA
[14] Univ Texas Houston, Houston, TX USA
[15] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[16] Mercy Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[17] Mayo Clin, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[18] Emory Univ, Med Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[19] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词:
CHRONIC LIVER-FAILURE;
IMMUNE DYSFUNCTION;
RIFAXIMIN TREATMENT;
INFECTIONS;
SURVIVAL;
RISK;
MORTALITY;
VARIANTS;
ASCITES;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000044
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for prevention of the first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP; primary prophylaxis 1 degrees) and subsequent episodes (secondary prophylaxis 2 degrees). We aimed to compare outcomes in cirrhotic inpatients on 1 degrees vs 2 degrees SBP prophylaxis. METHODS: Data from North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease were evaluated for cirrhosis details, reasons for admission/medications, inpatient course recorded, and outcomes over 90 days. Outcomes (intensive care units, acute kidney injury, inpatient/90-day mortality) were compared between the 2 groups after propensity-matching on admission model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and serum albumin. RESULTS: Among the 2,731 patients enrolled, 305 were on 1 degrees and 187 on 2 degrees SBP prophylaxis. After propensitymatching, 154 patients remained in each group. Patients on 1 degrees prophylaxis were more likely to have admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome (P50.02), with higher intensive care unit admissions (31% vs 21%; P 5 0.05) and inpatient mortality (19% vs 9%; P 5 0.01) than the 2 degrees prophylaxis group. Patients on 2 degrees prophylaxis had higher total (22% vs 10%; P50004), readmission (16% vs 9%; P50.03), andnosocomial (6% vs 0.5%; P50.01) SBPrateswithpredominantGram-negative organisms comparedto 1 degrees prophylaxis patients. At 90 days, 1 degrees prophylaxis patients had a highermortality (35% vs 22%; P50.02) and acute kidney injury incidence (48% vs 30%; P 5 0.04) compared to 2 degrees prophylaxis patients. DISCUSSION: In this inpatient cirrhosis study, despite prophylaxis, a high proportion of patients developed SBP, which was associated with mortality. Cirrhotic inpatients on 1 degrees prophylaxis had worse outcomes than those on 2 degrees prophylaxis when propensity-matched for the MELD score and serum albumin during the index admission and 90-day follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 606
页数:8
相关论文