Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain

被引:35
作者
Storheim, Kjersti [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brox, Jens Ivar [2 ,3 ]
Lochting, Ida [1 ,2 ]
Werner, Erik L. [4 ]
Grotle, Margreth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Commun & Res Unit Musculoskeletal Disorders FORMI, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[4] Uni Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Multidimensional scale; COMI; Clinimetric properties; Low back pain; DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINE SURGERY; QUALITY; CHECKLIST; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2393-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a short multidimensional scale covering all domains recommended to be included as outcome measures for patients with low back pain (LBP). The purpose of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the COMI into Norwegian and to test clinimetric properties of the Norwegian COMI version in patients with non-specific LBP recruited from various clinical settings. Ninety patients with non-specific LBP from primary care and hospital settings participated in the validation part and 61 also in the reproducibility part of the study (1 week apart). Acceptability, data quality, reproducibility and construct validity were investigated. The questionnaire was well accepted and with little missing data and end effects. Reliability in terms of intraclass correlations (ICC) was satisfactory for the COMI index [0.89 (95 % CI 0.82-0.94)] and most single-core items. Agreement was acceptable for the COMI index [standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) 0.80, minimal detectable change (MDCindividual) 2.21], but exceeded the minimal standard of acceptability in some of the individual core items. Construct validity was acceptable for the COMI index. The Norwegian version of the COMI index shows acceptable clinimetric properties in our patient population, but some of the sub-items had shortcomings. Our study, however, support the usefulness of the COMI index as an applicable stand-alone global scale when a light respondent burden is advisable.
引用
收藏
页码:2539 / 2549
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258589
[2]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[3]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[5]   The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire [J].
Broadbent, Elizabeth ;
Petrie, Keith J. ;
Main, Jodie ;
Weinman, John .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2006, 60 (06) :631-637
[6]  
Damasceno LH, 2011, EUR SPINE J
[7]   A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: Reliability and responsiveness [J].
Davidson, M ;
Keating, JL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (01) :8-24
[8]   HOPKINS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST (HSCL) - SELF-REPORT SYMPTOM INVENTORY [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
LIPMAN, RS ;
RICKELS, K ;
UHLENHUTH, EH ;
COVI, L .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (01) :1-15
[9]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[10]   Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain [J].
Ferrer, Montserrat ;
Pellise, Ferran ;
Escudero, Oscar ;
Alvarez, Luis ;
Pont, Angels ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Deyo, Richard .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (12) :1372-1379