For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson

被引：58

作者：

Berland, Leema K. ^{[1
]}

McNeill, Katherine L. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Austin, TX 78712 USA

[2] Boston Coll, Lynch Sch Educ, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA

来源：

关键词：

STUDENTS; SCIENCE; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY;

D O I：

10.1002/sce.21000

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：808 / 813

页数：6

共 31 条

[1] Andriessen J, 2006, CAMB HANDB PSYCHOL, P443
[2] [Anonymous], 1961, STRUCTURE SCI PROBLE
[3] [Anonymous], 2007, TAKING SCI SCH LEARN, DOI DOI 10.17226/11625
[4] [Anonymous], 2011, A framework for K12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas
[5] [Anonymous], 2008, SCI ED, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11191-006-9045-7
[6] Bazerman C., 1988, SHAPING WRITTEN KNOW
[7] Framing for scientific argumentation
Berland, Leema K.
Hammer, David
[J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2012, 49 (01) : 68 - 94
[8] A Learning Progression for Scientific Argumentation: Understanding Student Work and Designing Supportive Instructional Contexts
Berland, Leema K.
McNeill, Katherine L.
[J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 94 (05) : 765 - 793
[9] Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation
Berland, Leema Kuhn
Reiser, Brian J.
[J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 93 (01) : 26 - 55
[10] Explanation in scientists and children
Brewer, WF
Chinn, CA
Samarapungavan, A
[J]. MINDS AND MACHINES, 1998, 8 (01) : 119 - 136