Evaluation of intraocular lens mechanical stability

PURPOSE: To compare mechanical characteristics and stability of Clareon CNA0T0 intraocular lens (IOL) with 4 currently marketed monofocal IOLs and to evaluate axial displacement and simulated dioptric power shift using a range of compression diameters. SETTING: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Clareon CNA0T0, AcrySof SN60WF, enVista MX60, Tecnis ZCB00, and Vivinex iSert XY1 IOLs (10 per group) were assessed using standardized methods for axial displacement, optic decentration, and optic tilt per the International Organization for Standardization ISO11979-3. Axial displacement was also measured over a range of compression diameters (9.0 to 11.0 mm). RESULTS: At 10.0 mm compression, the mean axial displacement for the CNA0T0 IOL (0.02 mm +/- 0.01 [SD]) was significantly lower than for the MX60, ZCB00, and XY1 IOLs (P < .005). At all compression diameters, the CNA0T0 and SN60WF IOLs had the lowest levels of axial displacement and corresponding simulated dioptric power shift at the corneal plane versus other IOL models. At 10.0 mm compression, the mean optic decentration was within +/- 0.06 mm for all models, and there were no significant differences between the CNA0T0 IOL and other IOLs. At 10.0 mm compression, the mean optic tilt was no greater than 1.2 degrees for all IOL models evaluated; however, the mean optic tilt for the CNA0T0 IOL was significantly lower than for the MX60 IOL (P < .005). CONCLUSION: The CNA0T0 and SN60WF IOLs showed the lowest levels of axial displacement and corresponding simulated dioptric power shift over all tested compression diameters, indicating they might provide the most consistent refractive outcomes. Copyright (C) 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.