An Approach to Multi-criteria Environmental Evaluation with Multiple Weight Assignment

被引:19
作者
Agarski, Boris [1 ]
Budak, Igor [1 ]
Kosec, Borut [2 ]
Hodolic, Janko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Fac Nat Sci & Engn, Dept Met & Mat, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Multi-criteria evaluation; Parameter weighting; Alternative assessment; Environmental loading; SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-011-9294-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the domain of environmental protection, multi-criteria evaluation is used in cases where multiple alternatives, on the bases of multiple parameters, need to be evaluated. Depending on the particular goal of investigation, various approaches have been developed and applied. This various multi-criteria approaches differ in parameter weighting method, in data normalization method as well as in the method for assessment of alternatives. According to the applied multi-criteria methodology, the result, i.e., the rank of alternatives may differ to some extent. In this context, parameter weighting bears special significance in multi-criteria evaluation, while the choice of method is crucial for final result. The specificity of parameter weighting process in environment protection is directly related to pronounced interdisciplinary character of this area, as well as the large number of influential parameters. With this in mind, this paper presents an approach to multi-criteria evaluation which-through integration of three specific methods for parameter weighting-allows more flexible and multi-purpose application. Based on the established concept, a software application was developed. Besides automated parameter weighting, it also provides graphical interpretation of results. The developed approach and software have been verified on the case study related to evaluation of environmental loadings at six locations in the city of Novi Sad.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 266
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A multicriteria-based methodology for site prioritisation in sediment management [J].
Alvarez-Guerra, Manuel ;
Viguri, Javier R. ;
Voulvoulis, Nikolaos .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 35 (06) :920-930
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EUR TRANSP RES REV, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12544-009-0018-1
[3]   Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets [J].
Ashtiani, Behzad ;
Haghighirad, Farzad ;
Makui, Ahmad ;
Montazer, Golam Ali .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 9 (02) :457-461
[4]   Decision analysis methodology to evaluate integrated solid waste management alternatives [J].
Chambal, S ;
Shoviak, M ;
Thal, AE .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (01) :25-34
[5]   Optimal Site Selection of Watershed Hydrological Monitoring Stations Using Remote Sensing and Grey Integer Programming [J].
Chang, Ni-Bin ;
Makkeasorn, Ammarin .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (06) :469-486
[6]  
Crnobrnja B., 2009, RMZ MAT GEOENVIRONME, V56, P346
[7]   Aggregating and evaluating the results of different Environmental Impact Assessment methods [J].
Daniel, SE ;
Tsoulfas, GT ;
Pappis, CP ;
Rachaniotis, NP .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2004, 4 (02) :125-138
[8]   HOW TO USE MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT FOR SOCIAL DECISIONMAKING [J].
EDWARDS, W .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1977, 7 (05) :326-340
[9]  
Filar J. A., 2003, CALCUTTA STAT ASS B, V54, P93, DOI DOI 10.1177/0008068320030108
[10]   Fuzzy multicriteria decision aid method for conceptual design [J].
Gheorghe, RA ;
Bufardi, A ;
Xirouchakis, P .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 54 (01) :151-154