Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

被引:35
作者
Hwang, Mi Ri [1 ]
Park, Ji Won [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Park, Sohee [2 ]
Yoon, Hyekyoung [3 ]
Kim, Dae Yong [1 ]
Chang, Hee Jin [1 ]
Kim, Sun Young [1 ]
Park, Sung Chan [1 ]
Choi, Hyo Seong [1 ]
Oh, Jae Hwan [1 ]
Jeong, Seung-Yong [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst & Hosp, Ctr Colorectal Canc, Goyang, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Heath Promot, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Canc Biostat Branch, Goyang, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Hosp, Colorectal Canc Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PELVIC CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; INVOLVEMENT; SURGERY; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-014-3484-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a strong prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRM distance and recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods. We analyzed data for 561 patients who underwent preoperative CRT and curative surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer between August 2001 and December 2008. CRM was divided into four groups: group 1, CRM > 2 mm; group 2, 1.1-2.0 mm; group 3, 0.1-1.0 mm; and group 4, 0 mm. We assessed the associations of CRM with local recurrence and disease-free survival. Results. Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 487, 36, 20, and 18 patients, respectively. The local recurrence rate was highest and the disease-free survival rate was lowest in group 4, followed by groups 3, 2, and 1. Survival was similar between groups 2 and 1. Local recurrence rates were lower in groups 3, 2, and 1 than in group 4 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.91, P = 0.035; HR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.03-0.46, P = 0.002; HR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.08-0.42, P < 0.0001, respectively]. Disease-free survival rates were higher in groups 3, 2, and 1 than in group 4 (HR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.13-0.75, P = 0.009; HR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.10-0.54, P = 0.001; HR 0.26, 95 % CI 0.14-0.48, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions. After preoperative CRT, CRM distance provides useful information for risk stratification in the recurrence of rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1345 / 1351
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER
    ADAM, IJ
    MOHAMDEE, MO
    MARTIN, IG
    SCOTT, N
    FINAN, PJ
    JOHNSTON, D
    DIXON, MF
    QUIRKE, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) : 707 - 711
  • [2] Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
    Birbeck, KF
    Macklin, CP
    Tiffin, NJ
    Parsons, W
    Dixon, MF
    Mapstone, NP
    Abbott, CR
    Scott, N
    Finan, PJ
    Johnston, D
    Quirke, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [3] Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Preliminary results - EORTC 22921
    Bosset, JF
    Calais, G
    Mineur, L
    Maingon, P
    Radosevic-Jelic, L
    Daban, A
    Bardet, E
    Beny, A
    Briffaux, A
    Collette, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) : 5620 - 5627
  • [4] Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy
    Bujko, K
    Nowacki, MP
    Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A
    Michalski, W
    Bebenek, AB
    Pudelko, M
    Kryj, A
    Oledzki, J
    Szmeja, J
    Sluszniak, J
    Serkies, K
    Kladny, J
    Pamucka, A
    Kukolowicz, P
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [5] Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer
    deHaasKock, DFM
    Baeten, CGMI
    Jager, JJ
    Langendijk, JA
    Schouten, LJ
    Volovics, A
    Arends, JW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (06) : 781 - 785
  • [6] Quality of surgery in T3-4 rectal cancer: Involvement of circumferential resection margin not influenced by preoperative treatment. Results from EORTC trial 22921
    den Dulk, Marcel
    Collette, Laurence
    van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Marijnen, Corrie A. M.
    Calais, Gilles
    Mineur, Laurent
    Maingon, Phillippe
    Radosevic-Jelic, Ljijana
    Daban, Alain
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (12) : 1821 - 1828
  • [7] Assessing the evidence for an association between circumferential tumour clearance and local recurrence after resection of rectal cancer
    Dent, O. F.
    Haboubi, N.
    Chapuis, P. H.
    Chan, C.
    Lin, B. P. C.
    Wong, S. K. C.
    Bokey, E. L.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (02) : 112 - 121
  • [8] Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy
    Dworak, O
    Keilholz, L
    Hoffmann, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1997, 12 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [9] The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language
    Glynne-Jones, R.
    Mawdsley, S.
    Novell, J. R.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 (09) : 800 - 807
  • [10] Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma
    Gosens, Marleen J. E. M.
    Klaassen, Rene A.
    Tan-Go, Ivonne
    Rutten, Harm J. T.
    Martijn, Hendrik
    van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    van Krieken, J. Han J. M.
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (22) : 6617 - 6623