Magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle - Comparison of pain with electrical stimulation

被引:74
作者
Han, Tai-Ryoon
Shin, Hyung-Ik
Kim, Il-Soo
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Gyeonggi Do 463707, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
magnetic stimulation; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; muscles; pain;
D O I
10.1097/01.phm.0000223239.93539.fe
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The. objective of this study was to compare pain induced by magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps femoris (OF) muscle with that induced by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). Design: Magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous NMES were applied to OF muscles of 17 normal volunteers. The intensity of each mode of stimulation was increased in a stepwise manner. Peak torque values of isometric contractions of OF muscles and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at each intensity level. The VAS scores of the two stimulating modalities were compared at the intensity-generating same peak torque values. Results: The median VAS scores for electrical and magnetic stimulation were 5.7 and 0.3, respectively. The median difference between the VAS scores for electrical and magnetic stimulation was 3.7 (range, 1.7-8.5). The mean of the maximum peak torque obtained from each subject was higher in magnetic stimulation than in electrical stimulation (9.5 +/- 4.8 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.9 Nm). Conclusions: Magnetic stimulation of the OF muscle produced less pain at the same level of isometric peak torque than did transcutaneous NMES. Magnetic stimulation is a potential alternative to transcutaneous NMES, especially for persons with intact or residual sensory function.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 599
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THIN MYELINATED (A-DELTA) FIBERS IN HUMAN-SKIN NERVES [J].
ADRIAENSEN, H ;
GYBELS, J ;
HANDWERKER, HO ;
VANHEES, J .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 49 (01) :111-122
[2]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN PERIPHERAL-NERVE WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
MACCABEE, PJ ;
CRACCO, RQ .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1989, 103 (03) :282-289
[3]  
BAKER LL, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[4]   AN INTRODUCTION TO THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MAGNETIC NERVE-STIMULATION [J].
BARKER, AT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :26-37
[5]  
BARKER AT, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P100
[6]   Efficacy of two forms of electrical stimulation in increasing quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Bircan, C ;
Senocak, Z ;
Peker, Z ;
Kaya, A ;
Tamci, SA ;
Gulbahar, S ;
Akalin, E .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 16 (02) :194-199
[7]   Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Bethoux, F ;
Bohinc, T ;
Dobos, L ;
Davis, T ;
Friedl, A .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (05) :975-979
[8]   Comparison of discomfort associated with surface and percutaneous intramuscular electrical stimulation for persons with chronic hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Hart, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 77 (06) :516-522
[9]   Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials [J].
Glanz, M ;
Klawansky, S ;
Stason, W ;
Berkey, C ;
Chalmers, TC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (06) :549-553
[10]   FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION (FES) - MUSCLE HISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS [J].
GREVE, JMD ;
MUSZKAT, R ;
SCHMIDT, B ;
CHIOVATTO, J ;
BARROS, TEP ;
BATISTTELLA, LR .
PARAPLEGIA, 1993, 31 (12) :764-770