Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modeling

被引:101
作者
Qian, Yu [1 ]
Mishra, Debakanta [2 ,3 ]
Tutumluer, Erol [1 ]
Kazmee, Hasan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Boise State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Geosynthetics; Railroad ballast; Geogrid; Triaxial testing; Discrete element method; Degradation; RAILWAY BALLAST; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.012
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Recent research efforts at the University of Illinois have aimed at studying geogrid applications in railroad track structures, specifically focusing on ballast and subballast reinforcement. Ballast, typically comprising large sized aggregate particles with uniform gradation, is an essential layer in the railroad track substructure to facilitate load distribution and drainage. The primary mechanism of load transfer within the ballast layer involves inter-particle contact between ballast particles. Similarly, the effectiveness of ballast reinforcement with geogrids is primarily governed by the geogrid-aggregate interlock. Such interaction and the effectiveness thereof can change significantly as the level of grain size and shape degradation or fouling increases in the ballast layer with accumulation of train traffic. Although several studies in the past have investigated the effects of geogrid reinforcement on ballast shear strength and permanent deformation behavior, the effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement at different levels of ballast degradation needs to be further understood. In this study, monotonic triaxial shear strength tests were conducted on both new and degraded ballast materials with and without geogrid reinforcement. Two geogrid types, with square- and triangular-shaped apertures, were used in the laboratory to calibrate an aggregate imaging-based Discrete Element Method (DEM) modeling approach, which is capable of creating actual ballast aggregate particles as three-dimensional polyhedron blocks having the same particle size distributions and imaging quantified average shapes and angularities. The DEM model was observed to adequately capture the shear strength behavior of geogrid-reinforced triaxial ballast specimens prepared using both new and degraded ballast samples. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 402
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P JUB S POL GEOGR RE
[2]  
Bathurst R.J., 1987, Transportation Research Record, V1153, P8
[3]   Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast [J].
Brown, S. F. ;
Kwan, J. ;
Thoma, N. H. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2007, 25 (06) :326-335
[4]   Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions [J].
Chen, Cheng ;
McDowell, G. R. ;
Thom, N. H. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2012, 35 :76-86
[5]   3-DIMENSIONAL DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD FOR ANTIGRANULOCYTES MATERIALS [J].
GHABOUSSI, J ;
BARBOSA, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1990, 14 (07) :451-472
[6]  
Indraratna B., 2006, Geotechnical Properties of Ballast and the Role of Geosynthetics in Rail Track Stabilisation, V10, P91
[7]   Experimental and Numerical Study of Railway Ballast Behavior under Cyclic Loading [J].
Indraratna, Buddhima ;
Thakur, Pramod Kumar ;
Vinod, Jayan S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2010, 10 (04) :136-144
[8]   Simulation of triaxial compression tests with polyhedral discrete elements [J].
Lee, Seung Jae ;
Hashash, Youssef M. A. ;
Nezami, Erfan G. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2012, 43 :92-100
[9]   Discrete element modelling of railway ballast under monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading [J].
Lu, M. ;
McDowell, G. R. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2010, 60 (06) :459-467
[10]   Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates [J].
McDowell, GR ;
Harireche, O ;
Konietzky, H ;
Brown, SF ;
Thom, NH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 159 (01) :35-48