Relationship between language proficiency and growth during reading interventions

被引:4
作者
Burns, Matthew K. [1 ]
Frederick, Amy [2 ]
Helman, Lori [3 ]
Pulles, Sandra M. [4 ]
McComas, Jennifer J. [4 ]
Aguilar, Lisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Coll Educ, 109 Hill Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Teacher Educ, River Falls, WI 54022 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Curriculum & Instruct, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Educ Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
English language learner; language assessment; reading intervention; CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT; NONSENSE-WORD-FLUENCY; NON-HISPANIC STUDENTS; ENGLISH LEARNERS; SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION; DECODING SKILLS; 2ND-GRADE; STANDARDS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1080/00220671.2016.1158689
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many English language learners (ELLs) experience difficulties with basic English reading due in part to low language proficiency. The authors examined the relationship between English language proficiency and growth during reading interventions for ELLs. A total of 201 second-and third-grade students with a variety of home languages participated. The students were identified as needing a targeted intervention, because scores on the fall oral reading fluency screening measure fell below the benchmark criterion. Thus, all participating students received reading interventions approximately four times each week throughout the school year. Results indicated that those students identified in the lowest English proficiency stage on the Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State (ACCESS) made the highest growth as indicated in the spring benchmark assessment, and the ACCESS score added negligible variance beyond baseline reading skills. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 588
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Reading Proficiency and Mathematics Problem Solving by High School English Language Learners [J].
Beal, Carole R. ;
Adams, Niall M. ;
Cohen, Paul R. .
URBAN EDUCATION, 2010, 45 (01) :58-74
[12]   One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Spanish and English Interventions for English Language Learners at Risk for Reading Problems [J].
Cirino, Paul T. ;
Vaughn, Sharon ;
Linan-Thompson, Sylvia ;
Cardenas-Hagan, Elsa ;
Fletcher, Jack M. ;
Francis, David J. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (03) :744-781
[13]   Characterization of English and Spanish language proficiency among middle school English learners with reading difficulties [J].
Macdonald, Kelly T. ;
Francis, David J. ;
Hernandez, Arturo E. ;
Castilla-Earls, Anny P. ;
Cirino, Paul T. .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2022, 25 (05) :899-912
[14]   Developing Narrative Writing Skills via a Reading Programme for Low English Language Proficiency Undergraduates [J].
Mahadi, Tengku Sepora Tengku ;
Husain, Fauzilah Md ;
Jaganathan, Paramaswari ;
Hassan, Arbaeyah ;
Fesal, Sharifah Nur Hamizah Syed ;
Mohamad, Akmar .
GEMA ONLINE JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2018, 18 (02) :1-16
[15]   Examining the relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension for english language learners [J].
Quirk, Matthew ;
Beem, Sofie .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2012, 49 (06) :539-553
[17]   Interconnection between constructs and consequences: a key validity consideration in K-12 English language proficiency assessments [J].
Wolf, Mikyung Kim .
LANGUAGE TESTING IN ASIA, 2022, 12 (01)
[18]   Improving second language reading comprehension through reading strategies A meta-analysis of L2 reading strategy interventions [J].
Yapp, Deborah June ;
de Graaff, Rick ;
van den Bergh, Huub .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2021, 4 (01) :154-192
[19]   Assessing an Instructional Level During Reading Fluency Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects on Reading [J].
Burns, Matthew K. .
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2024, 49 (04) :214-224
[20]   Achievement and Growth on English Language Proficiency and Content Assessments for English Learners in Elementary Grades [J].
Buzick, Heather M. ;
Wolf, Mikyung Kim ;
Ballard, Laura .
EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2024, 43 (01) :83-95