Findings of the Survey on Prevention of Plagiarism in Lithuanian Research Journals

被引:0
作者
Dagiene, Eleonora [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
2ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION 2013 | 2014年 / 110卷
关键词
publication ethics; plagiarism; journal publishing; paper originality; self-pagiarism; CrossCheck; editorial policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.975
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
At the end of 2011, the Association of Lithuanian Serials initiated a survey, which aimed to ascertain whether Lithuanian journal editors, reviewers and authors encountered plagiarism, self-plagiarism and how they understood originality of a paper. Additionally, the survey looked at methods used for plagiarism prevention by editors and reviewers as well as ways, in which editors managed issues related to plagiarism. The survey suggests that no unanimous decision exists regarding the originality of a manuscript and that editors expect reviewers to identify plagiarism with little use of technologies. While answering to survey questions, respondents provided numerous comments. This demonstrates that plagiarism is a burning issue and scientific misconduct policy is needed in Lithuania. The survey was conducted during the period when the Lithuanian Research Council initiated the procedure for establishing the Ombudsman position. The Lithuanian Research Council funded several projects in 2012 and 2013, the aim of which was to familiarise the Lithuanian academic community with plagiarism prevention technologies and ethical aspects in academic publishing. The projects administrated by the Association of Lithuanian Serials provide research journal publishers and researchers related to journal publishing with a possibility of using CrossCheck system and discussing editorial policies. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1294
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Prevalence of Plagiarism in Recent Submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal
    Bazdaric, Ksenija
    Bilic-Zulle, Lidija
    Brumini, Gordana
    Petrovecki, Mladen
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2012, 18 (02) : 223 - 239
  • [2] Ethics and scientific publication
    Benos, DJ
    Fabres, J
    Farmer, J
    Gutierrez, JP
    Hennessy, K
    Kosek, D
    Lee, JH
    Olteanu, D
    Russell, T
    Shaikh, F
    Wang, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2005, 29 (02) : 59 - 74
  • [3] Björk BC, 2009, INFORM RES, V14
  • [4] Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals
    Bosch, Xavier
    Hernandez, Cristina
    Pericas, Juan M.
    Doti, Pamela
    Marusic, Ana
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [5] Plagiarism: Words and ideas
    Bouville, Mathieu
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2008, 14 (03) : 311 - 322
  • [6] Bretag T., 2007, Plagiary, P92
  • [7] Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use?
    Bretag T.
    Mahmud S.
    [J]. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2009, 7 (3) : 193 - 205
  • [8] Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran
    Butler, Declan
    [J]. NATURE, 2009, 462 (7274) : 704 - 705
  • [9] Scientific authorship Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
    Claxton, LD
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2005, 589 (01) : 17 - 30
  • [10] Scientific authorship Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines
    Claxton, LD
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2005, 589 (01) : 31 - 45